No, let's hold our horses.

No reservations are permitted except those expressly authorized in this Convention.

(a) The reservation is prohibited by the treaty

Do not save any articles

Impermissible reservations

God willing, shall not lack.

The responsibility for taking action on an inadmissible reservation should rest with the reserving State.

quot No reservations are permitted except those expressly authorized in this Convention. quot

15. Called upon, all States to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and encourages States parties to consider limiting the extent of any reservations they lodge to the Convention, to formulate any reservations as precisely and narrowly as possible and to review regularly any reservations made in respect of the provisions of the Convention, with a view to withdrawing them

An incompatible reservation would be null and void, irrespective of the reaction of other States parties.

The question of reservations to the Convention was addressed and encouragement given for the Convention to be ratified without resorting to reservations.

No reservations may be made under this Convention.

We sort of agreed to disagree.

I can't keep this up.

When article 21, paragraph 3, stated that the provisions to which the reservation related did not apply as between the objecting State and the reserving State to the extent of the reservation, it was referring to reservations permitted under article 19.

(c) Regularize its situation by replacing its impermissible reservation with a permissible reservation

In any case, the reserving State could always withdraw or modify an incompatible reservation, or withdraw from the actual treaty if its consent to be bound by that treaty depended on the reservation.

Such an objection could put strong pressure on the reserving State to withdraw its reservation or to amend it to bring it into line with the object and purpose of the treaty.

Conversely, where the reservation was not compatible with the object and purpose, the State could not be regarded as being a party to the Convention.

No reservations shall be made to the present Protocol.

Reservations should not be admissible to the protocol.

No, I want to keep it. Work it.

The presumption of freedom to formulate a reservation was different in substance from the presumption of the validity of a reservation.

The absence of objections to such kinds of reservations in the aforementioned period should not be interpreted as the tacit consent of Ukraine to such reservations.

The representative of South Africa, though favouring no reservations, was willing to accept reservations in the interest of reaching agreement.

If the reservation was incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, it would be ineffective irrespective of whether a State objected to it.

The objecting State might also expect that its objection, by conveying disapproval, would open the way for what the Special Rapporteur had referred to as the reservations dialogue by encouraging the reserving State to reconsider the need for or the content of its reservation.

It was noted that invalid reservations could not by definition achieve the result desired by the State that made them.

21. Urges States to limit the extent of any reservation they lodge to the Convention and to formulate any reservation as precisely and as narrowly as possible in order to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, to review their reservations on a regular basis with a view to withdrawing them, and to withdraw reservations that are contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention

22. Urges States to limit the extent of any reservation they lodge to the Convention and to formulate any reservation as precisely and as narrowly as possible in order to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, to review their reservations on a regular basis with a view to withdrawing them, and to withdraw reservations that are contrary to the object and purpose of the Convention

Sorry, we do not keep high scores for tutorial games.

B. Impossibility of making reservations to certain rights

No reservations may be made to this Protocol.One Party stated that it was not in agreement with this Article.

Yeah, but you still keep records, don't you?

An objection as to the validity of a reservation could not produce the same effects as an objection to a valid reservation, and in itself it did not demonstrate the invalidity of the reservation, which could only be assessed on the basis of the treaty itself.

However, account must be taken of the will of the reserving State regarding the relationship between the ratification of a treaty and the reservation.

Reservations

Keep It

Keep

Hold.

If no State objected to a reservation that did not necessarily mean that the reservation was valid, whereas the converse was also true.

Calls upon all States to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and encourages States parties to consider limiting the extent of any reservations they lodge to the Convention, to formulate any reservations as precisely and narrowly as possible and to review regularly any reservations made in respect of the provisions of the Convention, with a view to withdrawing them

18. Called upon all States to ensure that no reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention and encourages States parties to consider limiting the extent of any reservations they lodge to the Convention, to formulate any reservations as precisely and narrowly as possible and to review regularly any reservations made in respect of the provisions of the Convention, with a view to withdrawing them

It must also be borne in mind that States objecting to reservations did not wish to sever treaty relations with the reserving State, but rather to try to keep the reserving State a party to the treaty.

Save the observing session