We will talk today about local warming.

Now today, we're not talking about good and bad TV.

You have to be familiar with the issues we're talking about today.

Actually we're talking to ABC today about the Oscars.

Well we were talking on the human mind this morning.

I don't want to get into that, you know that's not my point.

For our science lesson for today, we will continue our discussion of Darwin's theory of the descent of man.

Having said that, let me turn to the matter under discussion today.

We often talk about the weather.

So, let me finish by saying that we've thought about this as a kind of engineering problem.

The effort to combat terrorism is prominent among our subjects of discussions today.

MS Right. We did a little bit of it here with 1,500 people in Long Beach, and we do it in a classroom at Harvard with about 1,000 students.

That is the best way to address the important issue we are discussing today in concrete terms.

Let's talk about this tomorrow.

However, we would like to comment, in particular concerning our country, with reference to the item discussed today.

Those three objectives reflect to a large degree what we are discussing today.

And this is what today is about it's about discussing those very opportunities.

The Peacebuilding Commission, which what we are dealing with here, is an organ that must be created.

And this is really what I want to talk to you about today about cancer.

So what I would like to do today is have something of a discussion.

In our discussions on trade in UNCTAD and in the discussions on investment here today, this emerges again.

I am very glad to have the chance to attend today's plenary meeting, dedicated to us, the youth of the world.

I will concentrate now on the question of Security Council reform, which we are addressing here today.

Before we get down to today's work I shall suspend the meeting for the informal interactive discussion.

We are pleased that the draft resolution is receiving much attention in the corridors, in informal discussions and in today's debate, which we hope will contribute to an informed discussion of our initiative.

Today we are invited to discuss the Secretary General's report entitled In larger freedom (A 59 2005).

My hope is that that discussion will draw upon the richness of the debate we have had today and that, over the course of next week, we can move to finalize and adopt a text.

The town leaders are planning on crushing InokoSensei's speech today.

That lends legitimacy to this morning's discussion to our adoption of appeals and proposals to break through the inertia in the other forums.

Discussing those issues today as representatives of our States, we must not forget that people in our countries are not interested in debates about agendas or procedure.

I wish, therefore, to expound our views on the other item that we are discussing today, namely, the Global Agenda for Dialogue among Civilizations.

The fact that we are discussing these three concepts together today in a plenary meeting of the General Assembly is an approach to nurture in the years to come.

So today, I would like to talk to you about the relationship between theater and technology.

We are meeting here today to discuss ways and means of mitigating to the greatest extent possible the impact of the substantial damage suffered by the affected countries.

And what I'd like to talk a little bit about today are some ideas that I think have just tremendous resonance with all the things that have been talked about the last two days.

We are discussing the issue of nuclear weapons today against the backdrop of our successive failures over the past couple of years, and particularly in 2005.

We had a very constructive and in depth debate at that time, and I do not want to repeat that discussion here today.

I think there are a couple there are many reasons but a couple just to focus on briefly.

That was what we were to discuss here today so that we could take resolute and urgent steps that would allow us to move forward.

perhaps we can discuss it tomorrow.

But nevertheless, that's not what I'm going to talk to you about tonight.

We look forward to discussion of these elements in coming months.

We'll talk about it tonight at the house over some grub.

But there are two things at heart that I think drive a conservative philosophy that are really relevant to this whole debate.

I am fully aware of the importance of the discussion that we are having today and fully aware of past practices.