The annual inventory review should be conducted as a desk or centralized review.

Lead reviewers should ensure that the reviews in which they participate are performed according to the review guidelines and are performed consistently across Parties by each expert review team.

Initial check by the expert review team, with the assistance of the secretariat Individual inventory review by the expert review team.

However, the expedited nature of this review procedure shall not compromise the thoroughness of the examination by the expert review team.

VII. FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING PROGRESS

A thorough review of the national system, as part of the review prior to the commitment period and its in country visit A desk or centralized review of any reported changes in the national system reported since the first thorough review, conducted in conjunction with the annual inventory review.

The review of the information on the minimization of adverse impacts in accordance with Article 13, paragraph 14, shall take place in two parts An annual desk or centralized review of additional information submitted by Parties included in Annex I, conducted in conjunction with the annual inventory review A thorough and comprehensive review through in country visits, conducted in conjunction with the review of national communications.

The section on Social and environmental responsibilities of the UNFCCC income and budget performance document could be extended to include an environmental budget and could be used to report these GHG emissions After a certain period of operation, should this initiative be reviewed to assess its efficiency and effectiveness and if so, what should be an appropriate timeframe?

Prior to the in country visit, the expert review team shall conduct a desk or centralized review of the national communication of the Party included in Annex I.

Agreement had been reached between MINUSTAH and UNDP Haiti on the integration of law programmes and the modalities were being worked out.

The inventory review process is conducted in three stages initial check, synthesis and assessment, and individual review.

Principles guiding the review of the implementation process

AdditionallyFurthermore, one Party asserted that the review at the intersessional CRIC should not only focus on the process of reviewing national and subregional reports, but it should also assess whether the review of such reports has contributed to improveing implementation of NAPs and SRAPs by Parties.

If either the annual inventory review or the review of changes in national systems recommends an in depth review of national systems, the process of inventory review of national systems should be conducted together with the following in country review either of the annual inventory or of the periodic national communication whichever is earlier.

Training programme for members of expert review teams for the initial review under the guidelines for review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol

If either the annual review or the review of changes in the national registry recommends a thorough review of the national registry, and if a country visit is considered necessary, this thorough review should be conducted together with the subsequent in country visit of either the annual inventory or the periodic national communication, whichever is the earlier.

During the review upon expiration of the additional period for fulfilling commitments, the expert review team shall review the information submitted by the Party under Article 7, paragraph 1, to assess whether

Twenty four GHG inventory reviews and 18 in depth reviews of national communications are scheduled.

A thorough review of the national registry shall also be conducted if the final review reports under paragraph 48 in part I of these guidelines recommend a thorough review of the national registry or if findings relating to reported changes in national registries considered by the expert review team lead to the recommendation of a thorough review in the final review report.

Meanwhile, regional meetings and fora forums should be convened prior to each CRIC session, so as to provide useful information as the basis for discussions in the CRIC session

The review of national systems shall take place in two parts

Qualifications of bidders are not evaluated at this stage, but rather after the auction and only with respect to the winner.

Annual periodic reviews would be undertaken, as well as a comprehensive evaluation at the end of the three year period in order to assess the programme apos s effectiveness.

Review process

Review process

The following steps will be taken in order to prepare for the fifththird session of the CRIC, taking into consideration the various legislative provisions guiding the reporting process

Several submissions affirmed that comments and deliberations at CRIC meetings focused appropriately on the modalities, structure and criteria of the implementation review process in order to ensure its efficient performance.

Comprehensive review of governance arrangements, including an independent external evaluation of the auditing and oversight system

Review of the terms of reference, operations and

(g) The ongoing development of the mission electronic fuel accounting system

This process has been enriched by the lessons learned, the dynamics of the CRIC sessions and the exchange of ideas, suggestions and proposals offered by various participants during the third session of the CRIC Through the review of implementation carried out by the CRIC potential action was identified, which could be undertaken at the national, subregional, regional and international levels.

This review should take place in conjunction with the annual review in accordance with the relevant procedures in paragraphs 115 to 117 below.

In years when an in country visit is not scheduled, an expert review team can request an in country visit if it believes, based on the findings of the desk or centralized review, that such a visit is necessary to allow for fuller investigation of a potential problem that the team has identified, subject to the consent of the Party included in Annex I.

The scope of such a review shall follow the scope set out for the in country review according to paragraph  100 above.

Peer review

A thorough review of the national registry as part of the initial review in accordance with paragraphs 11 to 14 in part I of these guidelines and in conjunction with its periodic review A desk or centralized review of any changes of the national registry reported in accordance with section I.G of the annex to decision CMP.1 (Article 7) in conjunction with the annual review.

However, since the Department of Peacekeeping Operations had been unable to provide the Board with an overall plan or schedule for the periodic assessment of missions, it had been unable to assess the extent of such reviews or assessments.

The review of national registries shall take place in two parts

Summary of the mandated reviews in 2006 2007

CRIC Committee for the review of the implementation of the Convention

CRIC Committee to Review the Implementation of the Convention

Also, in order to facilitate an in depth final review and appraisal, it would be appropriate if an independent evaluation of the implementation of the Agenda were carried out.

Proposed methodology 37 9 Detailed guidelines based on the format provided by the

The further development of each assessment and an extensive peer review process will take place in 2006.

The expert review team shall conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of the national system of each Party included in Annex I.