However, the debate will not be on the substance of the claim but only on the validity of the assertion of immunity.

The fact that the licence holder did not file a claim for the business tended to confirm an assertion by a non Kuwaiti claimant that he or she was the beneficial owner of the business.

Certainly you have made an abominable assertion

Certainly you have made an abominable assertion

There cannot be a more true assertion.

By contrast, in one set of potentially overlapping claims, the Panel reached the conclusion that the claims were overlapping, despite the individual claimant's assertion that his claim was mistakenly filed in the name of the E4 claimant.

Issue a PHP warning for each failed assertion.

Handle a failed assertion with a custom handler

increasing assertion of the role of nuclear weapons in military doctrines

The author has not rebutted this assertion, which she herself passed on.

We welcome the Secretary General's assertion that Article 51 of the Charter should not be changed.

Moreover, all the relevant national legislation is unambiguous in its assertion of equality between women and men.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

Some reporters would contest that assertion Sanders has not held a White House press briefing since 10 September.

What does that mean? Well, explanation is an assertion about what's there, unseen, that accounts for what's seen.

(a) The activities of Mr. Choi, contrary to the assertion of the Government, were not illegal and criminal.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

But how many of you would be able to make a confident assertion about a piece of classical music?

4.1 In its submissions of 21 June 2002, the State party's principal assertion is that the communication is inadmissible.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

As a rule of thumb your code should always be able to work correctly if assertion checking is not activated.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

The second is the assertion that a state party has a duty to provide compensation where such foreign claims are not successful.

This assertion, however, does not necessarily lead to the application mutatis mutandis of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

Third F4 instalment, claim No. 5000450 and fourth F4 instalment, claim Nos. 5000454 and 5000466.

This assertion, too, is supported by inadequately substantiated, not to say contradictory, arguments from the complainant in his comments of 4 August 2002.

The Committee notes that the author has neither disputed nor dismissed the State party's assertion that recourse to compensation is an effective remedy.

This contradicts the assertion by the authors that the court supposedly acknowledged the lack of equality in the questioning of the defence experts.