I fully agree with your point of view.

The Monitoring Team, based on its own experience, does not fully agree.

Do you agree?

Do you agree?

Tom didn't agree to do it.

To put it briefly, I do not agree.

I do not agree with you at all.

We fully agree that there is a need for the broadest possible agreement among Member States on this issue.

It is, I agree, a nice thing to do.

I wish that Tom would agree to do that.

We fully agree with the recommendations contained in the Secretary General's report concerning the role of the International Criminal Court.

We fully agree with the assessments that have been made, and we understand that difficulties are being encountered by the Commission.

Do you agree with what he says in the book?

Whether you agree or not, I m going to do it.

We fully agree with the Secretary General's view that United Nations reform must be comprehensive and should not follow a selective approach.

I am going to do it whether you agree or not.

I am going to do it whether you agree or not.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

We fully agree that the council should be in session throughout the year in order to be able to respond quickly to emergencies.

We agree fully with the Secretary General's assessment that there is a need for a new international consensus on the future of collective security.

States Parties emphasize the importance of, and agree to remain fully committed to, the full and effective implementation of the Treaty in all its aspects.

I do not agree, as is often said, that there is no political will.

And that is fully possible. Let's do it.

Of course, we should do all things, in an ideal world I would certainly agree.

Don't we all agree? I certainly agree.

I couldn't agree more. Science couldn't agree more.

But this team of multi disciplinary, highly skeptical and exceedingly talented researchers do agree on two things.

But I do agree with him about this. We can survive, and we can fail to survive.

We fully agree with the Secretary General's conclusions on the interconnectedness of the various actions that need to be taken to address the fundamental threats and challenges facing the world today.

If they do not agree on that, the body of guardianship will decide on the child's last name.

Are they going to do so even if it seems to impugn a cause with which they agree?

Well, part of the problem, surely, is people do not fully understand.

Are not the disbelievers paid (fully) for what they used to do?

Are not the disbelievers paid (fully) for what they used to do?

With regard to the rule of law, we agree fully with the Secretary General's view that the rule of law is the essential foundation for political stability, social progress and sustained development.

So they agreed, Okay, what we'll do is we agree on a common set of standards, code of conduct.

We fully agree with the Secretary General that his report must be considered as a whole package, not as an à la carte menu from which we can pick only the juicy recipes.

I agree.

I agree.

We agree.

They agree.

We agree.

How can you remain patient with that which you do not fully understand?

How can you remain patient with that which you do not fully understand?

I still do not really fully grasp why this debate is even necessary.