There would be more democracy, less oppression more freedom, less terrorism more growth, less poverty.

Less meat, less junk, more plants.

We try and do more and more with less and less time.

It's more with less and less again.

The more cheese, the more holes. The more holes, the less cheese. Thus The more cheese, the less cheese.

And more and more, less and less awareness of the pain of the other.

More is more forward, less is more backward.

More is more upward, less is more downward.

So actually we are getting less from more for less and less people.

No more. No less.

And what happened was that more from less you can see how much more for how much less.

Do more, and fail less.

A world obsessed with speed, with doing everything faster, with cramming more and more into less and less time.

I've been talking about getting more from less for more.

More for us, less for nature.

Graham Hill Less stuff, more happiness

More people, smaller spaces, less stuff.

This was more or less known.

Iran s Less is More Nuclear Policy

I understand it more or less.

Maybe, just maybe, less might equal more.

Something a bit more free, less constrained.

Children became more competent, and less helpless.

Your pronunciation is more or less correct.

So the message he was giving us was you must get more from less and less and less so that you can share it for more and more people, not only the current generation, but the future generations.

And I titled this more from less for more and more people as Gandhian engineering.

And we proved the concept, more or less.

Does that make streets more or less safe?

We need to use less to make more.

Two quotations to more or less end with.

If you fish less, you're actually catching more.

And you may have more or less neurons.

We can use less or more of them.

They want to spend less and save more.

More play will mean less time to study.

Other products cost less. Other products had more features.

Well, I've more or less said what I wanted.

So I was, more or less, classed as nothing.

And therefore tradition becomes more important, not less important.

Will they cheat more, or will they cheat less?

It should be opinion driven less news, more views.

We were more or less disappointed about the election.

The premises are also more or less the same.

It wasn't that the more religious people the people who remembered more of the Commandments cheated less, and the less religious people the people who couldn't remember almost any Commandments cheated more.

For a president bent on implementing reforms, less can be more less aggressiveness and less ego. But can a man act against his deepest nature?