Cost benefit analysis.

2. Less net operating cost

(c) Cost benefit analysis

VII. Cost benefit analysis

Cost benefit analysis sensitivity analysis

The Logistics Base has been evaluated using cost benefit and cost utility analyses.

Right? It's just like a cost benefit analysis.

7. Cost benefit analysis of the Logistics Base.

Like technological innovation, financial innovation is concerned with the perpetual search for greater efficiency in this case, reducing the cost of transferring funds from savers to investors. Cost reductions that represent a net benefit to society should be regarded favorably.

The decision tools that are most relevant for climate change adaptation are cost effectiveness analysis, multi criteria analysis, risk benefit analysis and cost benefit analysis.

In response to the request for a cost benefit analysis of the operation of the Logistics Base at Brindisi, this annex provides a cost analysis of the operation of the Base using both cost benefit and cost utility techniques.

This is necessary to ensure benefit security within acceptable cost parameters.

The two forms of cost analysis which are most relevant and applicable to the Base s situation are cost benefit analysis, and cost utility analysis.

So we can't fight the thing with a million to one cost, one to a million cost benefit ratio.

Now, in economic theory, cheating is a very simple cost benefit analysis.

The Advisory Committee believes that a cost benefit analysis should be undertaken.

To overcome such a predicament, a benefit cost principle can be applied.

These changes resulted in a net increase of 802 person months without additional cost because of the lower cost of local staff.

This estimate comprised a proposed maintenance budget of 10,220,700 gross ( 9,744,500 net) and a one time backlog clearance cost of 4,283,200 gross ( 4,207,500 net).

(d) Developing a cost benefit analysis for use in identifying information technology priorities

The cost benefit analysis is included as annex VII to the present report.

Individual cost benefit analyses of various specific equipment repair programmes are also feasible.

At this price, the net is very cost effective, if the additional cost and difficulties of retreating traditional nets are taken into account.

The cost of those missions is estimated at 200,000, which is a minimal cost in comparison with the benefit to UNHCR.

The cost of these missions is estimated at 200,000 which is a minimal cost in comparison with the benefit to UNHCR.

The cost of these eight temporary posts would amount to 2,318,100, net of staff assessment.

18. The total cost of the activities is estimated at 9,315,100 (net of staff assessment).

The net operational budget estimates of 19,216,920 represent a net reduction of 2,295,450, or 10.7 per cent in real terms, i.e. at 2004 2005 cost levels.

For FDI programmes to be effective, cost benefit analysis should be carried out properly.

A cost benefit system is thus used to assess where improvements are most urgent.

A special session was devoted to training, access to data and cost benefit ratios.

A cost benefit analysis could be conducted at the beginning of each successive iteration.

In such cases, the cost benefit analysis is quite simple the cost of the repairs is set against what it would have cost to procure the corresponding replacement equipment.

The total additional requirements requested by UNCIFYP amount to 4,464,600 gross ( 4,685,300 net), including 3,755,100 gross ( 3,975,800 net) resulting from the modified cost parameters and 709,500 for the cost of the emergency construction project during the 2004 05 financial period.

The cost estimates contained in document A 52 512 for UNSMIH remain unchanged at 4,653,400 gross ( 4,433,800 net), as do the cost estimates of 8,831,100 gross ( 8,462,300 net) for UNTMIH for the period from 1 August to 30 November 1997.

Decentralization should not simply transfer the burdens of management, but have a net positive benefit to motivate local engagement.

Data is also available for individual cost benefit analyses of various specific equipment repair programmes.

(a) Reasonable assurance the cost of a control or measure should not exceed its benefit.

(c) Post related cost adjustments amounting to a net increase of 57.3 million as a result of

g Net of the additional requirement of 2,204,300 for troop cost reimbursement that has not been recorded.

The cost benefit analyses conducted in regard to those decisions were based mainly on qualitative aspects.

g Earmarked for a project entitled, Cost Benefit Analysis of Small Arms and Light Weapons Destruction.

The benefit cost ratio will then be used as the criterion to make the ultimate decision.

The average rate for net cost increases in the biennium 2006 2007 is 2 per cent per annum.

The average rate for net cost increases in the biennium 2006 2007 is 1.98 per cent per annum.