Where is the ticket seller?

Seymour's Darling and best seller.

...what was our biggest seller.

It would be a big seller.

So it wasn't a big seller.

Hardly surprising, says the carpet seller...

This book became, naturally, an enormous best seller.

Little Arnie is next. Seymour's Darling and best seller.

The seller filed an action for the payment of the price.

Under article 64(1) the seller could declare the contract avoided.

Whoever draws the lucky number... gives a present to the seller...

An Austrian buyer ordered tantal powder from the seller in Hong Kong.

3. expenses of packaging materials and packaging labour fees borne by the seller

This debuted at number two on the New York Times Best Seller list.

Fourteen weeks on the Best Seller list, eight printings, and still going strong.

A German buyer ordered to an Austrian seller twenty tons of pork meat.

The seller provided security for the part of the price to be prepaid.

The Danish buyer only informed the Austrian seller, who then informed the plaintiff.

The seller must be able to cite a legitimate reason for the refusal.

In all schools in Indonesia, there is usually a toy seller in the playground.

The buyer notified the lack of conformity of the cooling device to the seller.

The plaintiff, an Italian seller, sold marble slabs labelled Giallo Veneziano to the Austrian defendant.

It objected to the fact that the Court of Appeal found against the seller by avoiding the contract, since, in its view, the supply of chaptalized wine could not constitute a breach of the seller apos s obligation.

These never really caught on either the electric shoe warmer and drier. Never a big seller.

The seller apos s entitlement to payment of the price and interest on arrears was recognized.

A German buyer purchased garments from an Austrian seller, but did not take delivery of the goods.

In many cases, the financing is provided by the seller of the tangibles (inventory and equipment) purchased.

A French seller and a Spanish buyer concluded a number of contracts for the sale of maize.

For this purpose, the Austrian seller assigned to the plaintiff its purported damages claim against the defendant.

According to the appellate court, even a very negligent buyer deserves more protection than a fraudulent seller.

The seller returned the fax on the next day with the remark that the goods could not be delivered.

An Austrian seller accepted an order to produce, deliver and set up tapping equipment at a restaurant in Germany.

The seller apos s refusal to maintain the trade relationship and to proceed with further deliveries triggered the proceedings.

In July 1991 a French seller and a Belgian buyer concluded a contract for the sale of metal sheets.

The seller raised an objection to this decision on the ground that the French court did indeed have jurisdiction.

The Austrian seller did not inform the defendant, but gave notice to its insurance company, the plaintiff, for compensation.

After requesting the buyer by fax and telephone to take possession, the seller sold the goods to other buyers at a significantly lower price and sued the first buyer to recover the difference between the original agreed price and the actual price the seller had received.

Further, the Supreme Court stated that if the seller fails to repair the non conforming goods within reasonable time, the buyer may do so and claim compensation from the seller for the related expenses, which amount to damages within the meaning of article 45 (1) (b) CISG.

The Danish buyer, after receiving and using the goods, informed the Austrian seller about the non conformity of the goods.

The seller argued that it was an international sale governed by the International Sale of Goods Act and thus the CISG.

The seller made the sale conditional to the acceptance of the buyer by the defendant's credit insurance, which did not occur.

The buyer insisted by resubmitting by fax an offer to the seller, requesting the delivery of the meat in six days.

Germany, Court of Appeal of Cologne, Danish buyer v. German seller, 16 December 1992, (Yearbook Commercial Arbitration XXI (1996), p. 535).

The seller brought an action against the buyer before a French court, demanding payment of the full price and interest accruing.

The plaintiff, an Italian wine seller, sued the German buyer (defendant) for payment of the price of wine sold and delivered.