She also claims that during her detention the treatment she received amounted to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

She claims that she risks torture as a consequence of her membership in the Jatiya Party and because she is still wanted by the police.

She claims that her husband is a victim of human rights violations by Guyana.

She claims to be a victim of violations by the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

Since the complainant did not take those steps, she did not indicate the personal risks to which she now claims to have been exposed.

The author claims that, as a victim, she has not been privy to the court documents and, that, therefore, she cannot submit them to the Committee.

She also claims that Hungary has been bound by the Convention since becoming party to it in 1982.

Even though she claims that she was hiding and wanted by the police, she could visit the Swedish Embassy in Dhaka on 28 August 2000 to have an entry visa stamped in her passport.

She further makes claims that could be subsumed under article 7, even though this article is not specifically invoked.

4.6 On 30 January 2003, the author reiterated her previous claims and maintained that she has exhausted domestic remedies.

She claims to be the victim of a violation by Spain of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.

In this sense, she claims that the State party would be responsible for a repetition of such unlawful detention.

Moreover, although she claims having been forced to go into hiding in April 2000, she had no difficult in obtaining a passport for herself and her daughter in May 2000.

She further claims that there was no evidence of the murders being committed in aggravating circumstances, as found by the Court.

3.3 Lastly, the author claims that her situation in the Netherlands violates article 16 of the Covenant, given that she is not allowed to stay in the country nor is she expelled.

The author claims that she is a victim of violations of her rights under articles 18 and 19 of the Covenant, as she was excluded from University because she wore a headscarf for religious reasons and refused to remove it.

She claims to be a victim of a violation by Poland of article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

6.3 The author points to a number of circumstances which she claims demonstrate that her son did not benefit from the presumption of innocence.

The police also aid in the protection of victims by performing risk assessments in cases where the victim claims she or her family will be endangered if she is returned to her country of origin.

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

She claims that L. F. refused her offer to be compensated for half of the value of the apartment and turn over ownership to her.

She claims that the State party passively neglected its positive obligations under the Convention and supported the continuation of a situation of domestic violence against her.

She claims to be a victim of violations of articles 7, 9 and 16, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, by the Netherlands.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

She claims to be a victim of violations by Uzbekistan of her rights under articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The independent expert accompanied Ms. Dualeh to her home region of Puntland and extended to her his support in the event that she wished to follow up on her claims that she was raped and beaten while in custody.

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

Mayorga also claims she went to the police and had photographs taken of her injuries at a hospital, but later agreed to an out of court settlement because she felt terrified of retaliation and was worried about being publicly humiliated.

It has been shown that, on arrival in Spain, the complainant was not handed over to the police services as she claims, but was released to her family.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

Duplicate claims

Reclamation claims

In particular, she claims that provisions of the Mental Health Protection Act, under which the decision to confine her was taken, are incompatible with article 7 of the Covenant.

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

The process claims were allowed by the Patent Examiner, while the product claims disallowed.

Admissibility of claims

(e) Medical claims

Stand alone claims

The median amount claimed is about USD 470,000 for claims in this instalment, compared with about USD 263,000 for all claims, about USD 335,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 276,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme Approximately 75 per cent of the claims in this instalment contain D8 D9 business losses in relation to unincorporated establishments in Kuwait.

The fifth F4 instalment includes a number of claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories.

The E4 claims population consists of claims submitted by Kuwaiti private sector corporations and entities, other than oil sector and environmental claims, eligible to file claims under the Commission's Claim Forms for Corporations and Other Entities ( Form E ).