Our conclusion is supported by the State party's own arguments submitted to the Committee in the earlier Carpo case.

6.3 The State party reiterates its arguments in respect of the author's alleged abuse of his right of petition.

Such activity necessarily entails the holding of meetings, where arguments, sometimes critical of the existing State structure, take place.

9.3 As to the State party's remaining arguments, the Committee considered that these generally recast the arguments originally advanced to it in the course of the Committee's initial consideration of the admissibility of the petition.

5.1 In comments dated 15 March 2002, the authors supplied comments, restricted to the admissibility arguments of the State party.

ARGUMENTS

The State party relies on the arguments set out in the judgement for its proposition that the author's rights were not violated.

Function arguments

Function arguments

Accepting Arguments

She states that, in response to the Committee's intervention, the State party covered the legal costs of supplementing her petition with additional arguments.

5.1 On admissibility, the State party reiterates the arguments made in its request to ascertain whether the complaint was still under active consideration.

7.3 In the light of the Committee's finding above, it need not address the remaining arguments of admissibility advanced by the State party.

Command Line Arguments

Variable function arguments

The State party argues that in his absence, the court was able to examine the case on the basis of the written arguments provided.

The Committee considers, however, that the State party's arguments raise only substantive issues which should be dealt with at the merits and not the admissibility stage.

Citation from the arguments of one of the Councillors of State, E. Gaviria Liévano, Los Monjes en el diferendo con Colombia (Bogotá, 2001), pp. 164 165.

Both the arguments are optional.

The arguments are gaining acceptance.

5.3 In response to arguments that municipal councils are not State organs, the petitioners invoke the Committee's general recommendation XV on article 4 for the contrary proposition.

On the State party's arguments concerning timely submission of the complaint, he argues that it was unclear for a long period who was entitled to represent the complainant.

6.3 The Committee has taken note of the State party's arguments concerning the inadmissibility of the complaint ratione temporis and the comments by the authors on this subject.

The State party may inform the Committee that the reasons for the interim measures have lapsed or present arguments why the request for interim measures should be lifted.

Arguments are always of type pval.

Several delegations repeated previously advanced arguments.

The author makes three subsidiary arguments.

Subsequently, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court, alleging, among other arguments, the failure of the Provincial High Court to state the grounds for its decision.

There'll be huge professional arguments as well.

But I don't engage in serious arguments.

You could see arguments on both sides.

9.5 As to the author's argument that the Supreme Court's decision in his case is inconsistent with the State party's obligations under article 27 of the Covenant, the State party recalls the issues and arguments presented to the courts and their decisions.

We conclude that the arguments advanced by the State party are insufficient to make the restriction of the author's right to freedom of expression compatible with paragraph 3 of article 19.

Why should we get away from those arguments?

So third meeting, arguments are pretty well exercised.

So the Discommunicator is a tool for arguments.

There are arguments for caution in this process.

In the complainant's view, by failing seriously to contest the facts and or the legal arguments put forward, the State party has in effect expressed its tacit, yet clear, acceptance of both.

4.5 Even if, in the light of these arguments, the Committee were to consider that interference occurred, the State party regards it as not arbitrary and thus not contrary to article 17.

The arguments of so called ID theorists are the same old arguments that had been refuted again and again, since Darwin down to the present day.

5.3 With regard to the non disclosure of the document, the author contests the State party's arguments and points out that Ms. Gascon's written statement was essential for his full answer and defence.

All the arguments except the name argument are optional.

This single slide completely dismantles the intelligent design arguments.

Arguments are the database name and the table name.

These are the arguments we have which cause gridlock.