Source Superior Electoral Court

Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Rogin J.)

Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Smith J.)

Indeed, the First Nations have initiated an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

2.4 On appeal, the Superior Court of the District of Bedford, on 13 April 2000, reversed the decision of the lower court.

On 12 July 1994 the Superior Court decided that it had no jurisdiction to hear the case.

The case is Bordini v. Donald J. Trump For President Inc., 16 CS 14300, General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division County of Mecklenburg (Charlotte).

8.5 The same applied in relation to the argument that actions are pending in the Federal Court and in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

Case 533 Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Smith J.) Shane v. JCB Belgium N.V. (14 November 2003)

The Court recorded that the Superior Court had specifically invited the parties to submit new evidence, whose clear position was to proceed on the existing record.

There is a right of appeal from the Court to the Supreme Court of Pitcairn, which is a superior Court of record and has jurisdiction in criminal and civil causes outside the competence of the Magistrate's Court.

The local judicial system is made up of a Superior Court and a Supreme Court led by judges appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Legislature.

According to the authors, that issue had never been raised The decision of the Superior Court of Justice was inconsistent.

Stay of Application, dated 20 March 2002, Jazairi v. Ontario Human Rights Commission, Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Wilkins J.).

Case 533 CISG 5 Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Smith J.) Shane v. JCB Belgium N.V. (14 November 2003)

Case 531 Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Rogin J.) Dunn Paving Ltd. v. Aerco Trading Inc. (1 May 2001)

They contend the Superior Court misinterpreted this statement to mean a renunciation to provide any evidence at all, even before him.

On 3 February 1995, the Superior Court admitted the appeal filed by the company against the judgement of 12 July 1994.

Syndicat de la fonction publique du Québec Inc. v. Québec (Attorney General), Québec Superior Court, no. 200 05 011263 998, February 4, 2004.

After declining the Superior Court's invitation to supplement evidence, counsel for the corporation unsuccessfully attempted to do so in the Court of Appeal.

Before the Superior Court, they stated that they would prefer to introduce such new evidence before him, rather than at a new trial.

In May 1993, the company sued the State of Argentina and the Province of Neuquén in the Superior Court of the Province of Neuquén.

Case 531 CISG 35 (2) (c) Canada Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Rogin J.)Dunn Paving Ltd. v. Aerco Trading Inc. (1 May 2001)

However, precisely these issues are either raised in the proceedings pending in the Federal Court by the Williams Treaties First Nations, or could be raised in the action before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

2.7 On 20 March 1996, the Superior Court of the district of Montreal allowed the deputy prosecutor's motion for dismissal and rejected the author's appeal.

The Superior Court considered, on its view of relevant Supreme Court precedent of 1988, that it was up to the challenging party to demonstrate that section 58's limitations on freedom of expression were not justified.

Furthermore, the Superior Court had considered the parties' positions unequivocal and considered its equitable obligation to ensure neither party was taken by surprise to be fulfilled.

Source Superior Courts

However, Superior Court Presiding Judge Maria Cabret recently pointed out that the 3.5 million operating cost of the Supreme Court during its first year was still not accounted for.9 In order to guarantee a successful transition, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals will hear Virgin Islands Supreme Court appeals for the next 15 years.

(b) A superior who

The latter, which changed its official name to Superior Court of the Virgin Islands after the creation of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court, assumed full jurisdiction over all local civil matters in 1991 and all local criminal actions in 1994.

In Syndicat de la fonction publique du Québec v. Québec (Attorney General), the Superior Court of Québec had to deal with the issue pay equity between men and women.

2.3 In 1998, the complainant was tried in absentia in Egypt for terrorist activity directed against the State before a Superior Court Martial , along with over 100 other accused.

2.3 This decision was appealed through a request for reversal of the tribunal's decision, which was rejected on 13 May 1997 by the Superior Court of Justice in Murcia.

Article 105 (3), provides that The Supreme Court of the Republic of Sri Lanka and the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Sri Lanka shall each be a superior court of record and shall have all the powers of such court including the power to punish for contempt of itself, whether committed in the court itself or elsewhere, with imprisonment or fine or both as the court may deem fit.

6.2 The State party emphasizes that the Superior Court invited counsel for the corporation to add to his evidence if he wished to do so in the context of a new trial.

5.3 The authors argue that they did not refuse to introduce new evidence on the vulnerability of the French language and the visage linguistique of Québec to the Superior Court, on first appeal.

On 10 April 2004, a retrial began before the 13th superior military court on charges of joining and leading an illegal group or organization and criminal conspiracy, to which the complainant pleaded not guilty.

Cristian Santos, Biblioteca, Superior Tribunal de Justiça, Brasilia

The State party argues that after having received its submissions, the author then made his application to the Ontario Superior Court (see paragraph 5.1) to secure evidence to fill his evidentiary gap before the Committee.

The fact that you have Rome without coffee makes Rome with coffee look superior, and not just to Rome without coffee even superior to Paris.

This carpet is superior to that one in quality.

He is superior to his opponents in all respects.

They argue that the Superior Court judgement, upheld on appeal, had the effect of imposing a burden on an accused (to supply certain evidence) without allowing the accused to meet that burden, in violation of article 14.

Father has now got a superior position in his office.