This got me thinking.

She really hates this kind of thinking.

She really hates this way of thinking.

There are two ways of thinking about this.

We are obsessed with this way of thinking.

So in some ways, we think that this baby's thinking is like the thinking of the most brilliant scientists.

He's thinking about this difficult problem.

This kind of thinking drives economists crazy, and it should.

I never see this picture without thinking of my father.

You're thinking, Wikipedia doesn't say this fact.

This is not right. It requires thinking.

They lose this stuff that facilitates this sort of playful and building mode of thinking.

And this has really gotten me thinking about this experience of the initial encounter.

Because of this way of thinking, they exhibit such kinds of thoughts.

We have different ways of thinking with regard to this issue.

The policy implications of this reasoning add value to current thinking.

Then last minute, I'm thinking, 'Can't do this. This is wrong.'

And I'm thinking, This is really, really great.

I remember sitting there thinking, this is fantastic.

So I'm thinking How can I do this?

And I kept thinking about this 70 percent.

And I'm thinking, no, this is not possible.

This brain is very much a thinking machine.

Because if you spend this week thinking about Iraq and thinking about Bush and thinking about the stock market, you're going to miss one of the greatest adventures that we've ever been on.

What are you feeling and thinking about this photo, about this woman?

So, there are two ways of thinking about this word, I think.

This is the kind of thinking that went into creating The 99.

This year we were thinking, Why does it work?

And I was thinking, how do I introduce this?

I'm thinking, This is my kid. How dare she?

But I'm also sure, pretty sure, that absolutely nobody is thinking of this.

Every town that has a volunteer fire department understands this way of thinking.

This is one of the things they ought to be thinking more about.

And whatever number you're thinking of, it probably isn't as bad as this.

I said, You're thinking about this just way too early.

This one is called What the Fuck Was I Thinking?

So we started out thinking this was a stopgap measure.

And I kept thinking over and over again this question.

And yet people are interestingly resistant to the idea of applying evolutionary thinking to thinking to our thinking.

So I have been thinking about this question a lot lately.

And I think in that sense, this fits really nicely with this lateral thinking idea.

So, this sort of thinking about structure as computation and structure as information leads to other things, like this.

We need to be thinking more about permaculture, which is why I think this image just sums up for me the kind of thinking we need to be doing.

We're so used to thinking in terms of biology, we think about genes this way.

Anyway, I believe that that kind of thinking offends the intellectual rigor in this room.