This can change. This can change.

This change, this change. To see change that we must have if we care about the future.

This is real, tangible change, real, tangible change.

So this change, I believe, is a huge disruptive change.

This is your change.

It may change this century.

I can do this. I can change this.

This is going to change science, I believe, and it will change religion.

We can change this behavior, however.

This is a phase change material.

We urgently need to change this.

This is constructed by physical change.

This building was wired for change.

Booted up in a cell, the program would execute, and it could result in this person or with a small change, it could result in this person or another small change, this person or with a larger change, this dog, or this tree, or this whale.

And if we change where we make the folds, if we change the folding ratio, then this cube turns into this one.

So how can we change this dynamic?

Our party wants political change this year.

And this change is getting more rapid.

This, I think, is a huge change.

The president wanted to change this rule.

This requires forging strong coalitions for change.

The change that this measure has produced.

This time of separation is subject to change.

We've got to change this stuff up fast.

This is a shift change, one of three.

This process facilitates systemic change and political legitimacy.

In response, it was said that no substantive change had been intended by this, and that this change could be further considered by the Working Group.

Is this change, though, a real change, or is it a figment of the imagination of the patient themselves?

This is perhaps a first element of a change.

You've seen this slide before, but there's a change.

Now, think about how this can change people's lives.

Now, let's just change one thing in this scenario.

The weather will change for the worse this afternoon.

How about eating out this evening for a change?

And we're not going to see this change in this system anytime soon.

But for this institution to become an engine of change in the twenty first century, it must now change itself.

We can change the folding ratio again to produce this shape, or this shape.

This change may be necessary and should be considered immediately.

And this is the answer we would have to change.

This change was made in OECD article 26 in 2002.

In this coming year, we must and can see change.

Right? This is the change in liking score, the change from the first time they ranked to the second time they ranked.

And the authors of the position paper on climate change from which I obtained these pictures attribute this change to unknown processes.

This could totally change the way that you interface with paper.

If you change this hormone pathway in flies, they live longer.