We must agree on the Secretary General's counter terrorism strategy.

We agree that change must come, but also that it must come with increased effectiveness.

We agree with those who believe that we must improve conventional methods of fisheries management.

We agree that we must not lose our focus once we have moved past the emergency stage.

We must devise and agree to faithfully implement innovative and practicable measures to ensure that we reverse current trends.

Now you must agree that I'm I must rely on other senses, right?

Don't we all agree? I certainly agree.

We agree that we must be ambitious in our work and ensure that the decisions taken at this year's summit are bold and irreversible.

We agree.

We agree.

We agree with the basic premise that further joint efforts to meet the MDGs must be based on the Monterrey consensus.

We fully agree with the Secretary General's view that United Nations reform must be comprehensive and should not follow a selective approach.

We must agree on comprehensive, bold and action oriented reforms to strengthen the United Nations and adapt it to the world of today.

The international community must agree on a more consistent and coherent approach to peacebuilding.

We could not agree more.

We could not agree more.

We entirely agree with this.

We could not agree more.

We also agree that, even if it would be preferable for action to be taken by consensus, that must not become an excuse for postponing action.

The international community must agree on stabilization targets for greenhouse gas concentrations beyond that date.

We agree that all forms of impunity must be effectively combated with regard to violations of international humanitarian and human rights law involving civilians in armed conflict.

Before we address our ambitious plans to reform our Organization, we must first agree on a number of premises and basics to secure our path towards the realization of our common objectives.

We must push forward and agree on the modalities of the Peacebuilding Commission quickly so that it can be ready to work by 31 December 2005, as we pledged at the summit.

We agree with the Secretary General that

Didn't we agree to stop the subject?

We fully agree with the Secretary General that his report must be considered as a whole package, not as an à la carte menu from which we can pick only the juicy recipes.

Whatever measures we agree on for implementation in the United Nations reform agenda must enjoy legitimacy and broad based support if they are to be effective and universally respected.

We must agree on sufficiently comprehensive recommendations aimed at, inter alia, reforming the current system of international trade and financial relations, and we must adequately rethink reform of the United Nations system in order to respond to the problem of development, which is undoubtedly our greatest challenge.

We agree with the view that ways must be found to ensure greater ownership and capacity among local actors to ensure a more acceptable, implementable and sustainable post conflict peacebuilding programme.

No one argues we all agree there's a problem.

We agree with a phased approach to its reorganization.

We agree that stable funding is important for peacebuilding.

However, before that can occur, all States must show true political will and agree that the implementation of the Protocol must be subjected to strict and continuous oversight.

We agree that much more must be done for them to be attained, that time is of the essence, that action not rhetoric is required, and that what is done must be done better so that people can live in freedom from want.

Although we now agree on the goal of democratization, without which there can be no true sustainable development, we must take account of historical and cultural factors when determining the pace of democratization in any given society.

He said, he said, he said, 'We can't, we can't let nobody find out about this.' He say, 'You've got to help me.' I agree. I agree.

We agree with the key elements of the reform agenda.

We agree that the responsibility to protect civilian populations lies first and foremost with each individual State, and we accept that responsibility and agree to act in accordance with it.

What we don't agree on is what the problem actually is.

We agree that Security Council reform is important and long overdue.

We agree that they merit a proper place in our system.

We believe that that is not sufficient, since we have before us the opportunity to be more ambitious, to go beyond adjustments and to agree on a new consensus regarding the form in which the Organization must face today's challenges.

While we agree with the general thrust of the points raised in the civil society report at the midpoint of the Decade for a Culture for Peace, we must say that one cannot hope to get one's wishes granted completely.

Heads of State and Government must therefore agree on the nature of the threats and opportunities before us and take decisive action.

Governments must use force only as a last resort and identify and agree on clear guiding rules and principles on doing so.