Globalizing NATO

NATO after Riga

The Death of NATO

The Necessity of NATO

The Primacy of NATO

Re Booting NATO Russia Relations

Sarkozy s Three Way NATO Bet

Read more from NATO Wakes Up

The Truth about NATO Burden Sharing

As at 30 August, ISAF total strength was 11,551 personnel from 26 NATO nations plus 309 from 11 non NATO nations.

The headline was NATO Admiral Needs Friends.

Israel and NATO Between Membership and Partnership

Nato to Lebanon but on one condition

The European members of NATO responded by invoking the Article 5 mutual defense clause of the NATO charter and coming to the aid of the US in Afghanistan, where today there are 32,000 NATO troops. Because they train together, NATO countries can operate effectively even when not all members of the organization are officially involved.

As at 25 January 2005, ISAF total strength was 8,027 personnel from 26 NATO nations plus 268 personnel from 10 non NATO nations.

Kabul convoy attack Nato soldier killed in suicide blast

NATO forces went in, and the Serbian army withdrew.

None of the ideas for another dose of NATO rejuvenation looks like the answer. All the talk of an improved NATO European Union partnership is mainly wasted breath.

But NATO, though it defends Estonia, reacted very prudently. Why?

NATO membership carries obligations, because situations may arise and we have already experienced them when NATO follows a United Nations appeal and conducts an out of area military intervention where, for example, genocide is being committed. In other words, NATO membership, like EU membership, comes at a price.

Five soldiers and an interpreter were injured, a Nato statement said.

Third, the idea implicit in Medvedev s plan that Russia should have veto power over all security related decisions of NATO or the EU must be rejected. Given that Russia s own new military doctrine presents NATO as a potential threat, its leaders can logically claim that NATO enlargement undermines Russian security.

At the same time, the continued long term commitment of NATO to the future development of Bosnia and Herzegovina was marked by the opening of a new NATO Headquarters in Sarajevo.

WASHINGTON On April 2 4, NATO will hold its biggest summit ever in Bucharest, the capital of its new member, Romania. Incredibly, NATO has invited its fiercest critic, Russian President Vladimir Putin, to attend.

beginning a dialogue on tactical nuclear weapons involving Russia, the US, and NATO

NATO has been involved in the destruction of a number of surplus stockpiles.

Report on the Partnership Action Plan against Terrorism, NATO Istanbul Summit, June 2004.

NATO had developed a programme of work for its technological response to terrorism.

NATO has committed itself to providing similar support for the spring electoral process.

While some Central European members that were formerly occupied by the USSR continue to see NATO as a political insurance policy against a revival of Russian ambitions, NATO is no longer aimed against Russia. In fact, Russian officers are welcome to participate in military exercises and to visit NATO headquarters under the Partnership for Peace program.

This does not mean that Moscow should be given a veto over Ukraine's security orientation or that Ukraine can never become a member of NATO. The door for Ukraine to join NATO should remain open.

Because NATO couldn't be 100 sure that the Kremlin was indeed behind these attacks.

In August 2003, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) assumed command of ISAF indefinitely.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, many predicted the end of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Yet a few weeks ago, NATO held its summit meeting in the Latvian capital of Riga, formerly part of the USSR.

In the NATO arena you will see the term S3 as defined in the Allied Ordnance Publication 15 Guidance on the assessment of the safety and Suitability for Service of Non Nuclear Munitions for NATO Armed Forces.

Why not start now to overcome the traditional tension between NATO and the EU especially as French policy toward NATO under President Nicolas Sarkozy has been moving in the right direction? A regular mutual presence of the Secretary General of NATO and of the head of EU foreign policy in the councils of both organizations doesn t require much time and effort.

Today, 26 NATO Heads of State and Government will meet at NATO Headquarters in Brussels. They are here to demonstrate a strong spirit of unity in the transatlantic community, a determination to look forward and take action together.

This is Verdun, a battlefield in France just north of the NATO headquarters in Belgium.

The European Union, NATO, and the UN Secretary General confirmed their support for the Initiative.

NATO is expected to continue providing both the assistance and advice needed to press forward.

The purpose of the remaining non strategic nuclear weapons held by NATO is fundamentally political.

Quick reaction forces, operational reserve troops and NATO air presence contributed to this enhanced security.

NATO itself is developing protections for our deployed troops. But with the new US approach to missile defense, there are now much better opportunities for an effective NATO wide system that would enhance the territorial defense of our populations and nations.

Indeed, France s return to NATO is far from a U turn that reflects disenchantment with ESDP. Rather, it is the product of a 15 year process of rapprochement with NATO and of the real progress being achieved in European defense.

EUFOR has developed a close and effective working relationship with the remaining NATO presence in Sarajevo.