We could apply the theory of punctuated equilibrium to languages.

And number two does this theory really work in detail, when you try to apply it to the world around us?

But what about the second question that I asked does the theory actually work when you try to apply it to the real world?

The God theory is not just a bad theory.

There was a theory.

So without a theory of planetary rings and with only grainy data, you can't have a good theory.

It is not a theory.

So beautiful. What a theory.

It's not a minority theory.

A Theory of Boardroom Justice

A Grand Unified Economic Theory?

The problems with having a theory is that your theory may be loaded with cognitive biases.

Now this is a fanciful theory.

He put forward a new theory.

Stephen Wolfram Computing a theory of everything

Denis Dutton A Darwinian theory of beauty

A theory must be followed by practice.

This is a physics and information theory term.

I have a theory I can explain later.

It's just a quick introduction to game theory.

I'm a biologist, and the central theorem of our subject the theory of design, Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection.

It was begun with the invention of relativity theory and quantum theory.

As a result, Glimcher is skeptical of prevailing economic theory, and is seeking a physical basis for it in the brain. He wants to transform soft utility theory into hard utility theory by discovering the brain mechanisms that underlie it.

So a very compelling theory that's really mainstream physics.

And that's what we mean by a unified theory.

So why should we have a good brain theory?

Now, some people call that a theory of everything.

In fact, there is a new theory of autism called the intense world theory, which suggests that the neocortical columns are super columns.

And 9 11 has a conspiracy theory. It is a conspiracy.

So that's a bit of a support for the leviathan theory.

So why don't we have a good theory of brains?

Normal science is a nice balance between theory and experimentalists.

But it got more manageable once they had a theory.

And there was a little an interesting theory about abstraction.

It's a difficult theory to discount, I think you'll agree.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.

And deterrence theory is a very simple theory of human behavior If you want somebody to do less of something, add a punishment and they'll do less of it.

Unlike the low entropy of the early universe, even though we don't know the answer for this, we at least have a good theory that can explain it, if that theory is right, and that's the theory of dark energy.

Theory and empirical evidence

That is the theory.

But how would you actually go about testing such a theory?

Now clearly, Kaluza was a man who took theory very seriously.

This is a man who would risk his life on theory.

First of all, it's going to be a theory about memory.

A theory is something that enables you to do less work.