So one way of trying to test the theory is to look for such chains inside connectomes.

This is a graph from a paper by Uri Gneezy and Aldo Rustichini, who set out to test, at the beginning of this decade, what they called deterrence theory.

The God theory is not just a bad theory.

And lo and behold, soon enough, I was able to put this theory to the test on two books that I was working on for Knopf.

There was a theory.

So without a theory of planetary rings and with only grainy data, you can't have a good theory.

Economists regard understanding the theory of comparative advantage as a test of professional competence. But are the incompetents say, the average person who believes that buying cheap imports from China destroys Western jobs always wrong?

It is not a theory.

So beautiful. What a theory.

It's not a minority theory.

A Theory of Boardroom Justice

A Grand Unified Economic Theory?

The problems with having a theory is that your theory may be loaded with cognitive biases.

Furthermore, the risk of torture must be assessed on grounds that go beyond mere theory or suspicion but it does not have to meet the test of being highly probable.

Now the CRP test is often done following a cholesterol test, or in conjunction with a cholesterol test.

Now this is a fanciful theory.

He put forward a new theory.

Stephen Wolfram Computing a theory of everything

Denis Dutton A Darwinian theory of beauty

A theory must be followed by practice.

I now propose a test for computer voices the Ebert test.

This is a physics and information theory term.

I have a theory I can explain later.

It's just a quick introduction to game theory.

I'm a biologist, and the central theorem of our subject the theory of design, Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection.

Because for them it's not a surgery test, it's an English test.

It was begun with the invention of relativity theory and quantum theory.

As a result, Glimcher is skeptical of prevailing economic theory, and is seeking a physical basis for it in the brain. He wants to transform soft utility theory into hard utility theory by discovering the brain mechanisms that underlie it.

So a very compelling theory that's really mainstream physics.

And that's what we mean by a unified theory.

So why should we have a good brain theory?

Now, some people call that a theory of everything.

In fact, there is a new theory of autism called the intense world theory, which suggests that the neocortical columns are super columns.

Because that case has been the subject of extensive commentary, it is discussed in more detail below to test the theory of the above commentators that rebus sic stantibus is applicable to situations of armed conflict.

And 9 11 has a conspiracy theory. It is a conspiracy.

So that's a bit of a support for the leviathan theory.

So why don't we have a good theory of brains?

Normal science is a nice balance between theory and experimentalists.

But it got more manageable once they had a theory.

And there was a little an interesting theory about abstraction.

It's a difficult theory to discount, I think you'll agree.

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.

We have a test tomorrow.

I passed a language test.

And deterrence theory is a very simple theory of human behavior If you want somebody to do less of something, add a punishment and they'll do less of it.