Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Admissibility ratione materiae

Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Exhaustion of domestic remedies

Procedural issues Admissibility ratione temporis and ratione materiae Substantiation of claims by author Exhaustion of domestic remedies

Procedural issues State party's failure to cooperate Substantiation of claims by author Admissibility ratione materiae  Exhaustion of domestic remedies

Accordingly, these claims are inadmissible, for lack of sufficient substantiation for purposes of admissibility, under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Exhaustion of domestic remedies  Applicability of State party's reservation to article 22 of the Covenant

It contends that the extracts from newspapers referred to in the author's comments cannot be viewed as a substantiation of his claims about his innocence.

The authors regard this as sufficient substantiation.

4.6 Finally, the State party considers the complaint manifestly unfounded, as the complainant's claims fail to rise to the basic level of substantiation required in light of the arguments on the merits set out below.

On the issue of substantiation of claims, the authors argue that they have shown that the reductions of reindeer after the Ministry's decisions was a direct consequence of the impact of logging on pasture areas.

It challenges the admissibility on the basis that the same matter is already being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement, for non exhaustion of domestic remedies and for non substantiation of their claims.

Procedural issues Non exhaustion of domestic remedies lack of substantiation

Procedural issues Exhaustion of domestic remedies substantiation of the complaint

Procedural issues Non substantiation of claim for purposes of admissibility

Procedural issues Substantiation of claim by author Admissibility ratione materiae

Procedural issues Substantiation of the alleged violation exhaustion of domestic remedies

Procedural issues Adequate substantiation of the alleged violation exhaustion of domestic remedies

With regard to the claims under articles 2, 8, 9, 10, 14, paragraph 3 (d), 19, 21, 25 and 26 of the Covenant, the Committee considers that the author has not provided sufficient substantiation in support of his allegations, and accordingly declares them inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Furthermore, it notes the State party's statement that the complaint should be declared inadmissible for lack of substantiation.

5.4 The State party dismisses the allegations relating to access to lawyers as inadmissible for lack of substantiation.

In any event, the claim under article 16 lacks the minimum substantiation to make it compatible with provisions of the Convention.

Substantive issues Unfair trial no right of appeal failure to exhaust domestic remedies lack of substantiation in relation to certain allegations

Second instalment category A claims corrections Third instalment category A claims corrections Fourth instalment category A claims corrections Fifth instalment category A claims corrections Sixth instalment category A claims corrections First instalment category C claims corrections Fourth instalment category C claims corrections

The fourthsecond group of overlapping claims initially consisted of E4 claims related to 39seven category C claims and 24 category C and D claims.

The average number of loss types is 3.14 for the claims in this instalment, compared with 2.01 for all claims in the regular category D claims programme, 1.93 for Jordanian claims and 1.71 for Kuwaiti claims.

Furthermore, the claim lacks the substantiation that is necessary in order to render the complaint compatible with article 22, and should therefore be declared inadmissible.

Concerning the issue of duplicate claims, the secretariat indicated that it was aware of the risk of duplicate claims from the outset of claims processing and took steps to identify and eliminate such claims during the course of claims processing.

The average amount claimed for the claims in this instalment is about USD 2 million, compared to about USD 820,000 for all claims, about USD 934,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 861,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme.

Of these claims, the Panel recommends awards of compensation for two claims, while no awards are recommended for the remaining 16 claims.

review of non overlapping claims in the FOURTHsecond group of overlapping claims

These E4 claims were considered in the second instalment of E4 claims.

Duplicate claims

Reclamation claims

Of the 24 company claims in this instalment, 19 are stand alone claims four are corporate detainee claims and one is an E2 claim.

The process claims were allowed by the Patent Examiner, while the product claims disallowed.

It submits that the claim under article 3 should be declared inadmissible, since it lacks the minimum of substantiation to make it compatible with provisions of the Convention.

Admissibility of claims

(e) Medical claims

Stand alone claims

The median amount claimed is about USD 470,000 for claims in this instalment, compared with about USD 263,000 for all claims, about USD 335,000 for Jordanian claims and about USD 276,000 for Kuwaiti claims in the regular category D claims programme Approximately 75 per cent of the claims in this instalment contain D8 D9 business losses in relation to unincorporated establishments in Kuwait.

The fifth F4 instalment includes a number of claims or parts of claims that were deferred from previous F4 instalments or transferred from other claims categories.

The E4 claims population consists of claims submitted by Kuwaiti private sector corporations and entities, other than oil sector and environmental claims, eligible to file claims under the Commission's Claim Forms for Corporations and Other Entities ( Form E ).

As a result of the computer programme and manual follow up, 37,850 category A claims were identified as confirmed duplicate claims during the course of claims processing.

The individual category C and D claims in the thirtieth instalment are claims filed through a late claims programme established by the Governing Council for Palestinians who can demonstrate that they did not have a full and effective opportunity to file claims with the Commission during its filing period for individual claims from 1 January 1992 to 1 January 1996 (the regular filing period for individual claims ).

As stated above, the eligible category D Palestinian late claims have a higher incidence of loss types and higher amounts claimed than claims in the regular category D claims programme, giving rise to a potential risk of overstatement of the claims.