Review of the draft MTSP for 2006 2009

Review of draft national adaptation programmes of action

The draft guidelines on training and career development are under review.

Review of the work programme Draft programme budget for

Continuation of the review of the draft convention, based on the draft text proposed by the Chair.

Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the the heritage of indigenous peoples

Draft terms of reference for the review of the financial mechanism

Draft terms of reference for the review of the financial mechanism

Draft decision V Review of the regular programme of technical cooperation and the Development Account

The CODEXTER will reconvene to consider these opinions and review the draft in February 2005.

Draft conclusions on the internal review of the activities of the secretariat

The Chemical Review Committee drafting group incorporates comments from the Chemical Review Committee and its observers on the internal proposal and prepares a draft decision guidance document.

Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the protection of the heritage of indigenous peoples

Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the protection of the heritage of indigenous peoples

Review of the work programme Draft programme budget for the biennium 2006 2007

Review of the work programme Draft programme budget for the biennium 2006 2007

The first draft will go through a peer review in late January 2006.

The draft of each national communication review report will be sent to the Party included in Annex I subject to review for comment.

Without doubt, this rigorous review process has improved the quality, depth and relevance of the Draft Principles.

(b) Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the protection of the heritage of indigenous peoples.

(b) Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the protection of the heritage of indigenous peoples

review the revised draft harmonized guidelines set forth in document HRI MC 2005 3

The LEG initiated a review process of draft NAPA documents, upon request by LDC Parties.

The expert review team shall prepare a final individual inventory review report within four weeks of the receipt of the comments on the draft report.

If the Party concerned does not provide any comments within that period of time, the draft expedited review report becomes the final expedited review report If comments by the Party are received within the time frame indicated above, the expert review team shall prepare a final expedited review report within three weeks of the receipt of comments upon the draft report.

The Commission is requested to review the draft and approve that structure as the recommended international product classification standard.

Review of the draft principles and guidelines on the protection of the heritage of indigenous peoples 42 48 12

The LEG has initiated a review of draft NAPA documents, at the request of LDC Parties.

The draft procedures for review proposed below aim at elaborating on the provisions in paragraph 41, in particular by specifying detailed provisions for requesting a review, the scope of review, modalities for communicating with project participants and the designated operational entity (DOE) in question, possible outcomes of a review, and the coverage of costs relating to the review.

The Commission is requested to review the draft and, as recommended by the Expert Group, approve the draft of Revision 4 as the recommended international classification standard for economic activities.

The Chemical Review Committee drafting group incorporates, as appropriate, comments from the members of the Chemical Review Committee and takes note of the comments made by observers of the Chemical Review Committee on the internal proposal and prepares a draft decision guidance document.

The Chemical Review Committee forwards the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

The Chemical Review Committee forwards the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

For the expedited procedure for the review for reinstatement of eligibility, the following time frames shall apply from the date of receipt of the information The expert review team shall prepare a draft expedited review report within five weeks of the receipt of information from the Party concerned The Party concerned shall be provided with up to three weeks to comment upon the draft expedited review report.

The Working Group continued its review of the draft instrument on the carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea ( the draft instrument ) on the basis of

(7) The Chemical Review Committee forwards the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

(7) The Chemical Review Committee forwards the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

The expert review team shall prepare a draft of a review report on the national system, within six weeks of the receipt of the comments on the questions posed.

The expert review team shall prepare a final report on the review of the national system within four weeks of the receipt of the comments on the draft report.

If the Party concerned notifies the expert review team, within that period of time, that it does not intend to provide comments, then the draft expedited review report becomes the final expedited review report upon receipt of such notification.

We also welcome the inclusion of a review process in the draft resolution and the shelving of the question of the veto.

(7) The Chemical Review Committee will forward the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

(7) The Chemical Review Committee will forward the recommendation and draft decision guidance document to the Conference of the Parties for decision.

IAMB had the opportunity to review those reports in draft form with the auditors at its meeting on 17 and 18 April.

He pointed out that the draft resolution was very similar to the one adopted in 2004, and proceeded to review its content.