The leftmost question is the first question that the student attempted.

I've decided, ultimately, that this is the wrong question, that this is not the important question.

That is the big question.

And that question is this.

You could've answered that question.

That is indeed the question.

Question and that that could be fatal?

Of course, there's no page on the web which has answered that question because nobody has asked that question before.

And the answer to that question is, it doesn't matter, because that's not the right question.

And of course, I'm very happy you asked that question because that's a very good question.

And that question cleared the space.

Now mathematicians have answered that question.

I'm going to answer that question.

So that begs the next question.

Any student can answer that question.

He could not answer that question.

This question is not that simple.

The question is, Is that an illusion?

So the question is, why is that?

FG I knew you'd ask that question.

So that's how I answer that question.

The statements in question mark that trend.

That is the fundamental question that we should all face.

I always thought that was an unfair question.

I answered that question when I was 15.

That was really the only question he had.

So will evil prevail? Is that the question?

That is a very difficult question to answer.

Did you know that this is a question?

It is now time to answer that question.

And it seems to me that the first question is entirely a biology question, and it's extremely hard to answer.

Answering that question requires that we first answer another question Compared to what? What is the alternative against which to judge the degree of inequality that we see?

Japan hoped that further consideration would be given to that question.

And she asks also a question that Studs talks about this notion of the official truth, to question the official truth.

The question is not whether that is accepted the question is, what is the process to be followed to ensure that article 35 comes into force?

The question is has that damage erased the connectome?

That raised a question warps and curves in what?

That, to me, is the primary question about life.

In that last question, a surprising insight was revealed.

But now I want to actually also question that.

And so we start our designs with that question.

And the Supreme Court justices wrestled with that question.

This question must be discussed separately from that one.

Had any research been carried out on that question?

The question is, can the United Nations afford that?