4.5 The State party concludes that the author was afforded a fair trial before the Trial Court.

The Committee concludes that the author was the victim of a violation of article 9, paragraph 1.

The Committee, therefore, concludes that the facts submitted by the author do not raise any issue under article 26.

The State party concludes that it is thus untenable to suggest that the author can fish for personal consumption only.

Therefore, the Committee concludes that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.

The author concludes that her right to equality before the courts was infringed because she was unable to submit evidence on the same terms as the defendant.

Considering that the author was unable to cross examine the alleged victim, although he was the sole eyewitness to the alleged crime, the Committee concludes that the author was the victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 3 (e).

The Committee notes that the author has not commented on this discrepancy, and therefore concludes that he has failed to substantiate this claim, for purposes of admissibility.

The Committee therefore concludes that the author has not substantiated his claim and that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3 (a) of the Covenant, the Committee concludes that the author is entitled to an appropriate remedy including commutation of his death sentence.

In this respect, accordingly, the Committee concludes that the author has failed to exhaust domestic remedies, as required by article 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Optional Protocol.

As the author failed to avail himself of these remedies, the State party concludes that the communication is inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Optional Protocol.

It therefore concludes that the author has failed to substantiate his claims for purposes of admissibility, under article 2 of the Optional Protocol, and that these claims are thus inadmissible.

Therefore, the Committee concludes that the author has not substantiated this claim, for purposes of admissibility, and that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Therefore, the Committee concludes that the author has not substantiated this claim, for purposes of admissibility, and that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

The Committee therefore concludes that the author has not sufficiently substantiated his claim, for purposes of admissibility, and that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

The author concludes by arguing that even if he had never brought a complaint, the State party would have been under a duty to investigate the incident once it came to their attention.

Accordingly, the Committee concludes

The State party concludes that the author cannot claim to be a victim within the meaning of article 1 of the Optional Protocol and that his claim under article 26 is therefore inadmissible ratione personae.

The Committee therefore considers that the author has failed to exhaust domestic remedies in this regard, and concludes that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Optional Protocol.

The majority concludes that Denmark has failed adequately to support its decision to deport the author, a Ugandan citizen, following his conviction for drug related criminal offences and a prison sentence of two years, six months.

Therefore, in the light of the limited scope of review applied by the Supreme Court in the author's case, the Committee concludes that the author is a victim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.

In the present case, the Committee concludes the author has failed properly to substantiate his claim under article 14, paragraph 5, and decides that this part of the communication is inadmissible pursuant to article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

In the light of these considerations, the Committee concludes that the application to the author of Act 87 1991, which lays down a citizenship requirement for the restitution of confiscated property, violated his rights under article 26 of the Covenant.

The Committee concludes that the author has not substantiated the alleged violation of article 14, paragraph 3 (g), of the Covenant for purposes of admissibility, and that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

It therefore considers that the author has not substantiated this part of his claim under article 14, paragraph 3 (e), for purposes of admissibility, and concludes that this part of the communication is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

This concludes our business for today.

This concludes our business for today.

This concludes our business for today.

This concludes our business for today.

The report concludes with some recommendations for the future.

So I think this concludes the list of speakers.

The programme concludes its current phase in December 2005.

The process concludes with the inauguration of the National Assembly.

The Committee concludes that the author has not substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, that the removal of his lawyer from the trial was unlawful or arbitrary, that counsel was appointed against the author's will, or that he was unqualified to provide effective legal representation.

The report concludes with recommendations for consideration by the Commission.

6.3 The Committee considers that the author has sufficiently substantiated his claims under articles 18, paragraphs 1 and 3, and article 22, paragraphs 1 and 2, for purposes of admissibility. It concludes that the communication is admissible and proceeds to an examination on the merits.

The Mission concludes that an independent international investigation is needed.

This concludes my list of speakers for today.

(e) Section Chapter VI concludes this performance report.

This concludes my list of speakers for today.

This concludes my list of speakers for today.

For these reasons, the Committee concludes that this claim is inadmissible.

That concludes my introduction of the last report of the Sixth Committee.

This concludes my presentation of the remaining reports of the Sixth Committee.