Chinese Capitalism in a Global Era Towards Hybrid Capitalism, London Routledge.

Coronary Capitalism

Locust Capitalism

Redesigning Capitalism

America s Crony Capitalism

Capitalism and Skepticism

Is Capitalism Doomed?

Taming Speculative Capitalism

Does Capitalism Cause Poverty?

Coming Soon Capitalism 3.0

Good and Bad Capitalism

Inequality is Killing Capitalism

Is State Capitalism Winning?

Karl Marx oversold socialism, but he was right in claiming that globalization, unfettered financial capitalism, and redistribution of income and wealth from labor to capital could lead capitalism to self destruct. As he argued, unregulated capitalism can lead to regular bouts of over capacity, under consumption, and the recurrence of destructive financial crises, fueled by credit bubbles and asset price booms and busts.

Jacqueline Novogratz on patient capitalism

It's not about overthrowing capitalism.

As Rafael Di Tella and Robert MacCulloch have shown, the world s poorest countries are not characterized by naive trust in capitalism, but by utter distrust, which leads to heavy government intervention and regulation of business. Under such conditions, capitalism does not thrive and economies remain poor.

We've questioned the future of capitalism.

The Contradictions of China s Communist Capitalism

The New Bogeymen of Financial Capitalism

Labor in a World of Financial Capitalism

Even Fidel Castro now says that the only thing worse than being exploited by multinational capitalism is not being exploited by multinational capitalism.

That is bad for capitalists and thus for capitalism.

Words like philanthrocapitalism, and natural capitalism, and philanthroentrepreneur, and venture philanthropy.

RB Capitalism has been proven to be a system that works.

What Africans practiced was a different form of capitalism, but then after independence, all of a sudden, markets, capitalism became a western institution, and the leaders said Africans were ready for socialism.

I've explored, experienced, and experimented enterprise and capitalism to my heart's content.

So, we believe that values driven spending will force capitalism to be better.

What it's telling us is that capitalism is going to become more social.

My own work focuses on making philanthropy more effective and capitalism more inclusive.

Or as I like to call them, they are the midwives of capitalism.

Francis is right to focus attention on the plight of the world s poorest. Their misery, however, is not the consequence of unbridled capitalism, but of a capitalism that has been bridled in just the wrong way.

A few years ago, it was fashionable to worry about the challenge that authoritarian style capitalism (for example, in China, Singapore, Malaysia, or Russia) presented to Western democratic capitalism. Today, the problem is not only economic.

In recent years, a lot of intelligent people thought that capitalism had basically won.

In fact, capitalism, perhaps at its most remorseless, is a physical manifestation of psychopathy.

But the majority of the world neither benefits from capitalism nor from democratic systems.

By many measures, global inequality has been reduced significantly over the past three decades, implying that capitalism has succeeded spectacularly. Capitalism has perhaps eroded rents that workers in advanced countries enjoy by virtue of where they were born.

At the very least, it renders non viable all debt restructurings under the standard debt contracts. In the process, a basic principle of modern capitalism that when debtors cannot pay back creditors, a fresh start is needed has been overturned.

As the current crisis has demonstrated yet again, capitalism needs stabilizing arrangements such as a lender of last resort and counter cyclical fiscal policy. In other words, capitalism is not self creating, self sustaining, self regulating, or self stabilizing.

Nicolas Sarkozy, the leading contender in the French presidential election, recently lashed out against what he called speculative capitalism, and says he wants to moralize the financial zone created by the euro. What does Sarkozy mean by speculative capitalism?

Although Schumpeter brilliantly captured the inherent dynamism of entrepreneur led capitalism, his modern real successors smothered his insights in their obsession with equilibrium and instant adjustments. For Schumpeter, there was something both noble and tragic about the spirit of capitalism.

He thought that Ronald Reagan had shown that fiscal deficits don t matter. He believed in capitalism or at least in supporting big companies and the rich though whether he understood how free markets should work under the rule of law is more doubtful.

So Sarkozy shouldn t be lashing out against speculative capitalism. On the contrary, he should be asking how capitalism can be developed even further, with new institutions in finance and insurance to deal with the very important problem that his campaign has highlighted.

To put the assumptions very clearly capitalism, after 150 years, has become acceptable, and so has democracy.

The question now, however, is both about which form of capitalism and which type of democratic participation.