China s New World Order

Economists New World Order

New World, Less Order

Obama s New World Order

Governing a World Out of Order

Europe and the New World Order

Today, terrorism is a primary threat to world order.

Referring to the Cuban's representative's mention of the need for a new world information order, he said that it was Cuba, not the world, that needed a new world information order based on truth and freedom.

Does it make sense to participate in the existing world order?

As such, they constitute nothing less than an attack on world order.

A Study of Order in World Politics (London Macmillan, 1977), pp. 305 6.

So in order to help you understand where I'm coming from, let me bring you into my world, the world of experts.

In order to provide world class education, the Government started the National Curriculum project.

Chinkin, Yale Journal of World Public Order, vol. 7 (1980 81), pp. 202 205.

On the basis of their commitment to the establishment of a multipolar world and a new international order, expressed in the Russian Chinese Joint Declaration on a Multipolar World and the Establishment of a New International Order of 23 April 1997,

In setting the Millennium Goals, we recognized that, in order to re establish world order, the root causes of anger, despair, injustice and hatred must be addressed.

Kissinger defines world order as a concept of just international arrangements that is thought to be applicable to the entire world. Before the advent of the European Union, for example, Europe conceived of world order as a balance of great powers, in which multiple religions and forms of government could coexist.

We need it for our everyday life, in order to make the world a smaller place.

The nation State remains the focus of legitimate action for order and justice in our world.

Despite its imperfections, the United Nations embodies humanity's hope for a peaceful and equitable world order.

We built an institution that has helped to support a peaceful world order for six decades.

Yale Journal of World Public Order, vol. 7 (1980 81), p. 177 at pp. 194 195.

Our wish is to cooperate so that our noble purposes will govern the new world order.

The lessons of the Second World War are no less relevant for shaping a post war world order and for the future of international relations.

The one thing the visual system needs in order to begin parsing the world is dynamic information.

Yale Journal of World Public Order, vol. 7 (1980 81), p. 177 at pp. 194 and 195.

For this reason, we believe it is high time the world order asserted itself in modern terms.

Distorting the facts in order to present an image that fits well with the impression Turkey wants to project in order to prevail in the outside world must stop.

If world order is indeed under attack, that means ordinary people and their families are also under attack.

The world has a responsibility to react in order to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

A politically secure world community can be achieved only through a multilateral world order based on respect for the rule of international law, human rights and the non discretionary implementation of the resolutions of world legitimacy.

We also support the idea of repositioning the Economic and Social Council in order to enhance its effectiveness in dealing with the new challenges of economic and social development in the world, thus ushering in an era of greater social justice and a more democratic world order.

Such consolidation is virtually impossible in a unipolar world order, with its one sided concept of good and evil.

The United Nations must pursue its efforts in order to resolve other conflicts in various parts of the world.

The new world order has given way to an order less world, in which reliability and predictability have given way to rapid shifts in focus and fickle commitments. And, sadly, this state of affairs seems to be emanating not from countries in crisis, but rather from the US itself.

While globalization offers new opportunities, it also causes new global problems and deepens the inequalities embedded in the world order. It is no longer possible to sustain the current world order, which, based as it is on a skewed notion of center periphery relations, merely produces injustice and inequality.

They choose to leave their homes in order to earn money, to learn new skills, and to see the world.

We work to promote healthy vibrant societies, to ameliorate human suffering, to promote a more thoughtful, substantive, empathic world order.

To change the state of the world it was necessary to change the current unfair, unequal and unipolar international order.

We are participating in an historic event the endeavour to establish a just world order for the twenty first century.

Many of us here, especially those from small developing nations, are, therefore, convinced that world order must be dramatically strengthened.

If that is done, the United Nations and the world will be able to boast of a universal democratic system that will usher in a new and more peaceful world order.

That is essential for a world order in which decisions are optimal and therefore acceptable, and the use of force minimal.

WASHINGTON, DC Can we develop an international order that will keep the peace and allow countries to play by agreed rules? That is the question that Henry Kissinger poses in his new book World Order.

We are now faced with a question that calls for an answer by deeds rather than words Can we be united in order to survive, in order to literally save our world for future generations?