He's an author.

He's an excellent author.

He is an author.

That Agreement was cited merely as an indication of the discriminatory treatment applied to the author.

2.1 The author served as an officer in the Ugandan army during the rule of Idi Amin.

An author visited our school, Jack Gantos.

He is a doctor and an author.

He is an author and a politician.

However, the author failed to lodge an amparo.

Facts as submitted by the author

As a result, the requisite tests were not made and the author did not receive an effective diagnosis and treatment.

The man wearing glasses is an old Chinese author.

A member of the International Commission of Jurists with an amicus curia status was assigned to the author as legal assistance.

The facts as presented by the author

2.1 The author is an orthodontist living in the Netherlands.

In any case, the author submits that the procedure by which the author was said to be notified of the forthcoming hearing was improper , as it cannot be ascertained whether an oral or phone call as required by the statute was indeed made.

As at the time there was no settled practice or case law on the issue the author should have lodged an amparo.

The author was arrested together with an Irish citizen, from whom 2,996 tablets were confiscated containing a substance that proved to be an amphetamine derivative known as MDA.

The Committee reiterates that the requirement that an author exhaust domestic remedies attaches to each allegation of an alleged violation of the Covenant, not simply to the decision of a court or tribunal unfavourable to an author.

According to the author, this was contrary to Polish law, because the District Court's ruling should not have been officially recognized until the author had had an opportunity to pursue an appeal.

Before, the author was employed as a police officer.

2.2 The author filed an application for judicial review and annulment with the Fifth Chamber of the Supreme Court, convening as a military chamber.

3.4 For the author, his right to freedom of association was breached because he was punished for joining Hanchongnyeon as an ex officio representative.

On 21 October 1996, an appeal by Waldemar was denied and in January 1997, the Registry was amended to show the author as liquidator.

The author argues that this occurred in violation of Greek law requiring public officials to inform the prosecutor of an illegal act as soon as they become aware of it.

The author describes this remedy as an extraordinary remedy and one which is only available in cases of a violation of the law by lower courts.

3.1 The author claims a violation of article 14 of the Covenant, as he was not afforded a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal.

With regard to the fact that the doctor proposed by the author did not testify as an expert, the Court did not consider that the need for him to do so had been demonstrated, nor that the author would have obtained a favourable judgement as a result of his testimony.

The author of the communication is Raihon Hudoyberganova, an Uzbek national born in 1978.

2.1 The author is an associate professor of economics at York University in Toronto.

2.1 In 1979, the author was diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia.

But I'd just like to quote, finish at the end with a reference to a British author, an Oxford author whom I don't quote very often, C.S. Lewis.

The author had been provided an effective remedy, as the alleged inequality of treatment had been ascertained in national proceedings and was later removed by the legislator.

11.16 The author rejects the State party's argument that he is requesting an inappropriate remedy.

On 25 November 1996, the court rejected an application for review filed by the author.

It seems to us that the author must at least substantiate in some measure his complaint as the author has undoubtedly done in this case.

As such, according to the author, the Court's jurisdiction was incorrectly invoked.

The judge ruled that Waldemar should replace the author as Capital's liquidator.

2.2 On 29 April 1998, the author was permitted to leave the psychiatric institution, but continued her treatment as an outpatient treatment was completed on 22 July 1998.

The document and its contents were used to acquit the author in the lower court, as the judge regarded the document as proof that the author had not intended to steal the money.

The author claims that it would have been futile to lodge an amparo in his case.

On 30 June 1997, the Provincial High Court of Valladolid rejected an appeal by the author.

The author filed an appeal with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 25 January 1999.

2.2 The author and his colleagues challenged the restructuring in an application to the Supreme Court.

10.2 The author argues that as a member of a minority group, he is entitled to the protection of economic activities that comprise an essential element of his culture.