Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

Of this amount, more than USD 12 million relates to interest and claim preparation costs.

The first claim unit is for medical treatment costs for persons injured by mines and ordnance explosions.

Saudi Arabia notes that it did not claim the costs of restoration for these two items of damage in its claim No. 5000455, which was reviewed in the fourth F4 instalment.

Claims preparation costs A number of category D claimants have made claims for claims preparation costs incurred by them, either in amounts specified on the claim form or in general terms.

Iraq further states that it is not clear from the information provided whether Kuwait used these studies to prepare other claims, in which case it argues that the claim could constitute a claim for preparation costs.

Of those larger claims, it was suggested that most settle, often to avoid the potentially huge litigation costs involved in pursuing a claim.

In addition, Iraq states that, although the claim contains evidence of the results of the studies, the costs incurred are not well documented.

Iraq states that this claim unit should be rejected because it is not for actual costs incurred by the Government of Saudi Arabia.

The first proposed claim unit, in the amount of USD 2,159,326, was for costs incurred to strengthen the health care system in certain Iranian provinces.

Claim No. 5000453 is for the costs of studies undertaken by Kuwait University to assess the effects of Iraq's invasion and occupation on Kuwait's society.

Saudi Arabia recalls that it submitted a claim in the fourth F4 instalment for the costs of restoration of the damage described in paragraphs 588 and 589 above.

It argues that the entire claim is unjustified because no loss has been demonstrated, and it is unreasonable because the information on costs provided by Iran is incomplete and flawed.

According to Iran, the claim for project expenses relates to expenses due to amortization of equipment and devices, repairs and keeping of bouyants, administrative and staff costs during the postponed period .

The Organization's claim to the International Atomic Energy Agency under the cost sharing agreement for termination indemnity costs for Buildings Management staff separated during the 1995 staff reduction exercise is not resolved.

Within the Special Account for Buildings Management Services, there is an amount of 349,061 representing a claim for reimbursement from the Austrian authorities for stranded costs, Renewable Energy Surcharge and KWK Zuschlag.

The second proposed claim unit, in the amount of USD 17,254,532, was for costs incurred to implement a malaria control emergency campaign in Iran following the influx of refugees after 2 August 1990.

The fourth claim unit is for the costs of a long term epidemiological study and a medical screening programme to evaluate the impact of Iraq's invasion and occupation on public health in Kuwait.

Saudi Arabia has not considered damage to sea grass areas in assessing the extent of the damage, and claim elements relating to these have not been included in the proposed compensatory project costs.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

He described the claim for loss of business income as a claim for unpaid instalments due and owing for works already carried out in connection with the projects. He explained that the claim for the payment of relief related to the costs he incurred in evacuating foreign nationals employed in Iraq during the period from December 1990 to February 1991 and in compensating Iraqi employees who remained in Iraq.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

If the ball costs 10, the bat costs...

The first claim unit is for costs incurred by Iran to provide medical treatment and public health facilities to 144,048 refugees who entered Iran after departing from Iraq or Kuwait between 2 August 1990 and 2 March 1991.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

The third proposed claim unit, in the amount of USD 4,606,514, was for other costs , including administrative expenses, expenses incurred in the relocation and evacuation of refugees to medical centres and hospitals, and what Iran describes as negative externalities .

Costs

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Methodologies used to calculate costs Staff costs Salary and common staff costs The standard costs (in United States dollars) applied in determining staff costs in the proposed budget are based on actual salary costs for the first three months of 2005, and adjusted for step increments in 2006 2007.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.