The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

In support of this claim, Turkey relies on the same facts and evidence which it submitted in support of its fourth F4 instalment claim.

The Panel recommends compensation in relation to the claim for loss of support and MPA.

For example, in the claim of Al Ghoson Contracting Company, the Panel became aware of irregularities in the audited accounts provided by the claimant to support its claim.

The evidence provided by the claimant in support of this claim indicated that a multiplier of 10 should have been used to calculate the compensation for this claim.

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence in the form of audited financial statements and invoices to support the claim for loss of stock and loss of profits.

Iran relies on evidence from the published literature to support its claim.

The basis of the claim and the evidence provided to support it are similar to those provided in respect of the first claim unit.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

In one case, UNCC claim No. 3011337, all 55 purchase invoices provided by the claimant in support of his loss of stock claim were so altered.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

With respect to the claim for receivables, the Panel finds that the evidence adduced by the claimant in support of this component of the claim is insufficient to demonstrate the circumstances and quantum of any loss.

Finally, the Panel recommends no award of compensation with respect to the support losses, as it is only the recipients of such support who are able to claim for such losses.

Iraq states that the contingent valuation survey cannot be considered sufficient evidence to support this claim .

Whether, and if so to what extent, any such claim by a government will succeed depends on the nature of the claim and the evidence produced to support it.

According to Iraq, the claim is so poorly developed and so little information is presented that it is not possible to support any aspect of the claim in entirety .

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The secretariat's review of the documents provided in support of this claim indicated that the claimant's D6 claim was complementary to, and not a duplicate of, his C6 claim, and therefore the deduction initially performed by the secretariat was incorrect.

Claim No. 5000462 is for damage to cultural heritage resources claim No. 5000467 is for damage to livestock resources and claim No. 5000303 is for public health damage.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

Support was expressed for draft article 14, which codified the recognized rule of customary international law requiring the exhaustion of local remedies as a prerequisite for the presentation of an international claim.

The first claim unit is for damage to terrestrial resources the second claim unit is for damage to Kuwait's marine and coastal resources and the third claim unit is for the loss of groundwater resources.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Second claim unit Marine and coastal resources The second claim unit is for compensation for damage to marine and coastal resources.

In the claim under review, the Panel finds that the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence in support of the alleged contracts and recommends no compensation for the loss.

In support of his claim for D3 (death) losses, the claimant provided death certificates for his wife and daughter confirming that their deaths were caused by a missile attack on 9 February 1991.

Claim 5000468 is for expenses for remediation of damage to mudflats. Claim 5000183 is for expenses and other losses related to public health damage.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

Iran relies on the results of studies funded by awards in the first instalment of F4 claims to support its claim.

These are Claim No. 5000286 for loss of agricultural resources Claim No. 5000301 for loss of fisheries resources Claim No. 5000288 for losses resulting from the depletion of or damage to terrestrial, cultural heritage and marine resources Claim No. 5000287 for damage to public health and Claim No. 5000394 for the expenses of a public health monitoring and assessment study on the incidence of cancers and haematological disorders.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000286 32

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 37

Recommended award for claim No. 5000288 45

Recommended award for claim No. 5000287 55

Recommended award for claim No. 5000394 57

Recommended award for claim No. 5000304 69

Recommended award for claim No. 5000464 72

Recommended award for claim No. 5000460 81

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 83