In support of this claim, Turkey relies on the same facts and evidence which it submitted in support of its fourth F4 instalment claim.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

Iran relies on evidence from the published literature to support its claim.

The basis of the claim and the evidence provided to support it are similar to those provided in respect of the first claim unit.

In one case, UNCC claim No. 3011337, all 55 purchase invoices provided by the claimant in support of his loss of stock claim were so altered.

The Panel recommends compensation in relation to the claim for loss of support and MPA.

For example, in the claim of Al Ghoson Contracting Company, the Panel became aware of irregularities in the audited accounts provided by the claimant to support its claim.

The evidence provided by the claimant in support of this claim indicated that a multiplier of 10 should have been used to calculate the compensation for this claim.

Iraq states that the contingent valuation survey cannot be considered sufficient evidence to support this claim .

The individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence in the form of audited financial statements and invoices to support the claim for loss of stock and loss of profits.

Whether, and if so to what extent, any such claim by a government will succeed depends on the nature of the claim and the evidence produced to support it.

According to Iraq, the claim is so poorly developed and so little information is presented that it is not possible to support any aspect of the claim in entirety .

The secretariat's review of the documents provided in support of this claim indicated that the claimant's D6 claim was complementary to, and not a duplicate of, his C6 claim, and therefore the deduction initially performed by the secretariat was incorrect.

With respect to the claim for receivables, the Panel finds that the evidence adduced by the claimant in support of this component of the claim is insufficient to demonstrate the circumstances and quantum of any loss.

Iran relies on the results of studies funded by awards in the first instalment of F4 claims to support its claim.

Finally, the Panel recommends no award of compensation with respect to the support losses, as it is only the recipients of such support who are able to claim for such losses.

Iraq further states that Saudi Arabia also did not produce any baseline data of crop health or disease to support the claim.

The Panel finds that the evidence provided to support this claim unit is not sufficient to demonstrate the circumstances of the loss claimed.

Iraq contends that Iran has not provided sufficient evidence to support the claim unit, and that the documentation and information provided are inadequate.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

In support of his claim he refers, inter alia, to NGO reports indicating that the use of torture by the police in Bangladesh is common.

In support of this claim unit, Iran submitted the results of a study conducted by senior officials of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education.

In support of the claim, Iran relies on a study that compared rates of certain cancers before and after Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

Furthermore, the data provided by Jordan do not support the claim that the increases in water sector investments were due to damage resulting from the presence of refugees.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

In the claim under review, the Panel finds that the claimant has not provided sufficient evidence in support of the alleged contracts and recommends no compensation for the loss.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.