Her claim under the supervisory procedure (nadzornaya zhaloba) gave no result.

Such breach may lead to a claim under the draft Convention.

Accordingly, this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

4.13 Concerning the claim under article 24, paragraph 1, the State party argues that this claim is also insufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility.

Consequently, the Committee finds this claim inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

It follows that this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

The claim is accordingly unsubstantiated and inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

The Committee therefore considers this claim inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

Thus, the Committee considers this claim inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

6.7 As to the claim under article 26 of the Covenant, the Committee finds that the author has failed to present any arguments substantiating this claim.

(b) If both husband and wife are staff members, one may claim, for dependent children, under subparagraph (a) (i) and (ii) above, in which case the other may claim only under subparagraph (a) (iii) above, if otherwise entitled

However, his claim under article 26 being inadmissible because of the failure of the author to establish its applicability, it follows that his claim under article 26, read in conjunction with article 2, paragraph 3, is likewise inadmissible.

The Committee concludes that this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

2. Any State entitled to invoke responsibility under paragraph 1 may claim from the responsible State

Therefore, the Committee concludes that this claim is inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.

He emphasizes that this is not a new claim but that it is the same claim that he has brought under article 27 before the admissibility decision of the Committee.

The securities regulatory agency under the State Council should take corresponding measures to deal with customer s claim.

The Optional Protocol provides a procedure under which individuals can claim that their individual rights have been violated.

the Optional Protocol provides a procedure under which individuals can claim that their individual rights have been violated.

Accordingly, the claim under article 16 is inadmissible ratione materiae, as incompatible with the provisions of the Convention.

In the light of this finding, it is unnecessary to consider the author's additional claim under article 7.

The Optional Protocol provides a procedure under which individuals can claim that their individual rights have been violated.

4.2 The State party regards the claim under article 17 as inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.

6.2 As to the claim that the State party violated the author's rights under article 19, the Committee considers that the author has failed to substantiate this claim, for purposes of admissibility.

7.6 The Committee accordingly declares the claim under article 3 admissible and proceeds to its consideration on the merits.

There is however no labour law under which a woman who works for a family enterprise can claim remuneration.

7.3 As to the claim under article 3 concerning torture, the Committee considers, particularly in light of the complainant's account of his previous torture, that he has substantiated this claim, for purposes of admissibility.

The State party therefore considers that the claim under article 14, paragraph 1, of the communication is manifestly ill founded.

There was no analysis of the possible interplay between the CISG and the product liability claim under article 5 CISG.

The State party concludes that the author cannot claim to be a victim within the meaning of article 1 of the Optional Protocol and that his claim under article 26 is therefore inadmissible ratione personae.

In any event, the claim under article 16 lacks the minimum substantiation to make it compatible with provisions of the Convention.

The Committee concludes that this part of the claim is inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2 (b), of the Optional Protocol.

Accordingly, I find that he has not exhausted domestic remedies regarding his claim under article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.

The Panel also considers future remediation of Kuwait's mudflats area under claim No 5000468 at paragraphs 476 490 of this report.

That's the Russians planting a flag on the ocean bottom to stake a claim for minerals under the receding Arctic sea ice.

The Committee proceeds immediately to the consideration of the merits as it relates to the claim under article 19 of the Covenant.

6.3 The Committee has noted the author's claim that her son's rights under article 6, paragraph 4, of the Covenant, were violated.

10.1 On 6 and 27 April 2004, the authors commented on the State party submissions and withdraw their claim under article 27.

In his response to a notification issued under articles 15 and 34 of the Rules, the claimant substantially re characterised his claim.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

On the contention that the Muotkatunturi Herdsmen's Committee did not have standing to bring a claim under the Optional Protocol, the Committee referred to its constant jurisprudence that legal persons are not individuals able to bring such a claim.

First, the Panel noted that in some cases claimants clearly stated in their original claim submissions that they did not maintain audited financial statements, yet submitted audited financial statements in response to claim development notifications issued under the Rules.

With regard to the above finding, the Committee considers that it not necessary to examine the claim under article 26 of the Covenant.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.