We don't have disposable resources.

We don't have disposable species.

And we don't have disposable people either.

Whenever possible, refuse single use and disposable plastics.

And it's the idea that we don't have disposable anything.

Low and middle income families will benefit from a notable increase in disposable income.

By the end of 2005, the disposable annual income of a single parent family with two children receiving social assistance will have increased by about 2,240, and a single parent, two child working family will see their disposable income increase by about 5,400.

But it's completely safe, completely non invasive and silent.

And You re completely wrong, and I m sure you re completely wrong.

Today, you can buy a girl trafficked for a few hundred dollars, which means she's actually more disposable.

In this society where everything is disposable, it is a virtue to use something until it wears out.

Free flight rockets such as disposable anti tank rockets can pose a serious hazard when they become duds.

And that's led to this discussion that's completely raw, completely unfiltered.

What would help is if their nominal disposable income rose relative to their (fixed) debt service. Yet, with high levels of unemployment likely to keep nominal wage growth relatively subdued, typical troubled households could be worse off with higher food and fuel prices cutting into disposable income.

By 2004, China's annual GDP had risen to RMB13.65 trillion, and average per capita disposable income had risen significantly.

Completely opposite.

With a high household savings rate of around 30 of disposable income, per capita disposable income amounts to roughly half of per capita GDP. Expanded social security programs and a richer menu of saving and investment options could go a long way toward reducing precautionary saving and boosting consumption.

For most Americans, wages are the primary source of disposable income, which in turn drives personal consumption spending by far the largest component of aggregate demand. Over the past several decades, as growth in disposable income slowed, middle and lower income households turned to debt to sustain consumption.

And what we don't often appreciate is the price that poor people pay for us to have these disposable products.

Completely unprecedented, historically.

It's completely irrelevant.

They're completely natural.

I agree completely.

I'm completely exhausted.

You're completely right!

I completely understood.

Since the introduction of the Building Independence Strategy in 1998, low income families have seen their after tax disposable incomes increase.

They will completely lose.

This was completely unexpected.

This was completely unauthorized.

We were completely victorious.

Transitional is completely different.

I was completely wrong.

It was completely preventable.

I completely forgot it.

But first, I need to talk to you about what I consider one of the most egregious offenders in the disposable plastics category.

This has increased disposable income for the poorest families and still allowed New Brunswick to reach record lows in its social assistance caseload.

Which you can completely ignore.

But it looks completely right.

Its behavior is completely unchanged.

But it's something completely wrong.

Completely flat is not recommended.

This is just completely ridiculous.

The sky was completely dark.

The horses are completely handmade.