Such provision (not necessarily to be included in Chapter 10) could be a fault based liability with a reversal of the burden of proof, similar to the provision relating to the shipper's liability in paragraph 31(1) (previously 29(1)).

Moreover, there was support for the principle of liability without proof of fault, which was a trend in liability regimes at both the national and international levels.

It was suggested that the approaches of certain treaties that combined strict and fault liability should be followed.

2. These measures should include the imposition of liability on the operator or, where appropriate, other person or entity. Such liability should not require proof of fault. Any conditions, limitations or exceptions to such liability shall be consistent with draft principle 3.

In paragraph 1 it is stated that the general liability is based on negligence.

The shipper is relieved of all or part of its liability if it proves that the cause or one of the causes of the loss, damage or injury is not attributable to its fault or to the fault of any person referred to in article 35.

A strict liability that covers most of the obligations in article 30 would put too much burden on the shipper, taking into account that the carrier's liability is based on negligence.

Such a strict liability regime was in keeping with the polluter pays principle and was beneficial for victims of hazardous activities since it relieved them of the burden of proving fault.

Concerning the dissolution of marriage, Samoa indeed had a fault based system, which was a remnant of its colonial past.

It was also noted that draft principle 4, particularly the application of no fault liability under paragraph 2, should be carefully studied, with some delegations seeking more prominence for the polluter pays principle.

The liability for the description of the goods would then become a strict one according to 31(2) On the other hand some delegations have stated that the liability for breach of the article 30 ought to be entirely based on negligence.

It's our fault.

It's not Minjoo's fault

It's not my fault!

Not their fault, honestly.

Europe s Three Fault Lines

It's not my fault.

Whose fault is it?

That's not Jack's fault.

It's all my fault.

It's all Tom's fault.

It wasn't my fault.

It's all your fault.

That's not Tom's fault.

Liability insurance

Sorry. It's all my fault.

It's my fault, not yours.

It was recalled that the approach taken in article 5 (5) of the Hamburg Rules was based on exemption from liability and exempted the carrier from liability only for loss, damage or delay in delivery of live animals resulting from any special risks inherent in that kind of carriage.

I can't find fault with him.

It is only the cat's fault.

How could it be Tom's fault?

Woe to every fault finding backbiter

Woe to every fault finding backbiter

Such liability is incurred without prejudice to the criminal liability of individuals having committed the offences.

Criminal liability of migrants

Liability of legal persons

Liability of the Tribunal

J. Question of liability

And it's not our fault, anymore than it's our fault when our germs lay waste to people that haven't developed the immunity.

My fault. Don't applaud, this was clubs.

It wasn't your fault you're just fine.

His greatest fault is talking too much.

His greatest fault is talking too much.

He is always finding fault with others.

She insisted that it was my fault.