KB No? Good decision.

No. It should be Go Go Gadget!

No, no, no, shush. We've got to go quickly.

When a woman stands up and says, No, I won't go to the back of the bus, she didn't just affect her life. That decision shaped our culture.

No, I didn't go.

Go find a friend and explain to them how you made that decision.

OSCE decision No. 3 04, 7 December 2004.

Everybody's on oxygen, your supplies are limited, and you either have to go up or go down, make that decision very quickly.

No initiative, no measure, no activity and no decision in the field of development can be successful without peace.

Barbados, case No. 502 1992, decision adopted on 31 March 1994, and Lamagna v. Australia, case No. 737 1997, decision adopted on 7 April 1999.

He leaves, people go, No no no, we're not going to do that.

No, I don't want to go.

The decision already taken by the General Assembly on the matter must be adhered to in full, and there must be no attempts to go back on the agreements reached in June 2005.

986 2001, Semey v. Spain, decision of 30 July 2003 communication No. 1007 2001, Sineiro Fernández v. Spain, decision of 7 August 2003 communication No. 1101 2002, Alba Cabriada v. Spain, decision of 1 November 2004.

Will Juma go to the market with Hasani? No, he will go alone.

No one wants to go on Flolan.

We have no choice but to go.

Tom has no plans to go anywhere.

Tom has no choice but to go.

No, no. We share needles because we don't want to go to jail.

Go ahead, I've no fancy assistants underneath there.

No matter where you go, I'll follow you.

There's no need to go to school today.

Iceland, case No. 674 95, decision adopted on 11 May 1996.

b Case No. 10 1997, decision adopted on 17 March 1999.

c Case No. 17 1999, decision adopted on 17 March 2000.

i Communication No. 22 2002, decision of 19 March 2003, para.

In its decision on complaint No. 226 2003 (Tharina Ali v.

However, no decision has yet been taken on either side.14

No further decision on the issue has been taken since then.

The authors cite the Committee's decision in respect of communication No.

Decision of the Comptroller General of the United States, File No.

There should be no no go areas where civilian populations are under serious threat.

Finland, case No. 40 1978, decision adopted on 9 April 1981, J.T. v. Canada, case No. 104 1981, decision adopted on 6 April 1983, and Ominayak et al. v. Canada, op. cit.

Decision of 20 October 1922 (AD 1919 1922, Case No. 169) and decision of 23 May 1923 (AD 1925 1926, Case No. 331) (cited in Verzijl, supra note 6, at 382 83).

536 1993, decision adopted on 28 March 1995, para. 6.5, and communication No. 661 1995, decision adopted on 29 July 1997, para.

The Prosecutor's decision contained no indication of a possibility of further appeal.

In its decision on complaint No. 212 2002 (Kepa Urra Guridi v.

v. Norway, case No. 942 2000, decision adopted on 25 October 2002.

We'll go into areas we have no knowledge of.

If you want to go, then go. If you don't want to, then it's no big deal.

This work has to go on in an open and transparent manner, without artificially imposed deadlines for decision making.

And we'll have no international mechanism to figure out who makes the decision.

That proven democratic method of coming to a decision should frighten no one.

According to the State party, no cassation appeal was introduced against this decision.