The Review Panel recommendations are currently under consideration.

Review of the internal justice system (redesign panel)

These 20 claims were transferred to the Panel for review.

The Panel decided to review all of these claims individually.

The Panel decided to individually review these claims as well.

review by the panel of the deceased detainee claims Introduction

When it did review the request, the Panel had several questions.

As the Panel is not mandated to review claims of corporate entities, these losses were severed from the category D claims in the special instalment, and transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners (the merged E4' Panel ) for review.

The Panel commenced its review of the special instalment in June 2004.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK Mandate of the Panel The mandate of the Panel is to review the F4 claims and, where appropriate, recommend compensation.

External technical expert panel review of the ongoing monitoring and verification plan (biological provisions)

On 9 February, two high level panel discussions were held on the 10 year review.

The xx 19 category D claims have been transferred to the D2 Panel for review.

review by the panel of two claims for personal injuries filed pursuant to decision 12

The Palestinian Panel subsequently notified the D2 Panel that 14 of the eligible claims, which had already been transferred to the D2 Panel, were in fact ineligible and requested that the D2 Panel take this into consideration in its review of these claims.

During its review of bedoun claims, the Panel identified a number of factual or legal issues.

The Panel further determined that the claims in the remaining three groups required individual claim review.

In addition, the Panel took up for review one sub category F3 claim filed by Kuwait.

The Panel has taken up these two claims for review as part of the special instalment.

Those proposals were subsequently evaluated by a joint United Nations ESA review panel in July 1998.

RECOMMENDED AWARDS The total claimed amount with respect to the 404 category D claims transferred by the Palestinian Panel to the Panel for its review is USD 866,199,856.81.

In particular, the Review Panel recommended the inclusion of social condition as a prohibited ground for discrimination.

Review of the ongoing monitoring and verification plan (missile provisions) by the panel of external technical experts

This report also covers 10 other claims referred to the Panel by the Governing Council for review.

In the First D Report, the Panel developed the methodology for the review of D3 (death) claims.

This study ended with a preliminary review which was evaluated positively by a panel of CNES experts.

In addition, in reviewing the F3 claim of Kuwait taken up by the Panel in the special instalment, the Panel referred to previous reports of the F3 Panel to ensure that its review and recommendations in respect of the F3 claim was consistent with the F3 Panel's review of other sub category F3 claims.

After its individual review of these claims, the Panel recommends compensation in the total amount of USD 461,806.

At the direction of the Governing Council, the Executive Secretary referred bedoun claims to the Panel for review.

The Panel decided to review the group of 978 claims by means of applying a statistically representative sample.

Although the category D Panel (the D' Panel ) began its review of claims in 1996, the first five instalments of category D claims did not include any claims for business losses.

The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel review of the status of n propyl bromide pursuant to decision XIII 7

(a) The review meeting will comprise plenary meetings, an informal interactive hearing with civil society, panel discussions and round tables

(a) The review meeting will comprise plenary meetings, an informal interactive hearing with civil society, panel discussions and round tables

Having been informed of the clerical error, the Panel instructed the secretariat to send reasons review notifications to the claimants.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

(a) The review meeting will comprise plenary meetings, an informal interactive hearing with civil society, panel discussions and round tables

The Panel acknowledges the efficient work performed by the secretariat in connection with the Panel s review of the fourth instalment.

The Panel acknowledges the efficient work performed by the secretariat in connection with the Panel s review of the fifth instalment.

The documentation that would enable the Panel to perform such verification is presented in KOC s Physical Assets Claim and thus is not before this Panel, which was appointed to review the WBC Claim only.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED TO REVIEW THE WELL BLOWOUT CONTROL CLAIM

The Panel also elaborated certain refinements to its procedure in connection with the issuance of reasons review notifications in order to avoid a double review of the claimants' reasons for late filing.

After a review of the statistical data, the Panel decided that a decision regarding any global adjustment should be deferred until after the individual review of the claims, to determine whether such review was sufficient to adjust or eliminate overstated claims.

We note that 23 countries have signed on to the African Peer Review Mechanism, and the Peer Review Panel has completed country reviews for Ghana and Rwanda and presented its report to the African Peer Review Forum in Abuja for discussion.

In the third F4 report, the Panel noted that the primary sources of the law to be applied by the Panel in the review of claims for compensation are listed in article 31 of the Rules.