The Review Panel recommendations are currently under consideration.

Review of the internal justice system (redesign panel)

These 20 claims were transferred to the Panel for review.

When it did review the request, the Panel had several questions.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK Mandate of the Panel The mandate of the Panel is to review the F4 claims and, where appropriate, recommend compensation.

External technical expert panel review of the ongoing monitoring and verification plan (biological provisions)

On 9 February, two high level panel discussions were held on the 10 year review.

The Palestinian Panel subsequently notified the D2 Panel that 14 of the eligible claims, which had already been transferred to the D2 Panel, were in fact ineligible and requested that the D2 Panel take this into consideration in its review of these claims.

RECOMMENDED AWARDS The total claimed amount with respect to the 404 category D claims transferred by the Palestinian Panel to the Panel for its review is USD 866,199,856.81.

In particular, the Review Panel recommended the inclusion of social condition as a prohibited ground for discrimination.

Review of the ongoing monitoring and verification plan (missile provisions) by the panel of external technical experts

After its individual review of these claims, the Panel recommends compensation in the total amount of USD 461,806.

Although the category D Panel (the D' Panel ) began its review of claims in 1996, the first five instalments of category D claims did not include any claims for business losses.

The Technology and Economic Assessment Panel review of the status of n propyl bromide pursuant to decision XIII 7

(a) The review meeting will comprise plenary meetings, an informal interactive hearing with civil society, panel discussions and round tables

(a) The review meeting will comprise plenary meetings, an informal interactive hearing with civil society, panel discussions and round tables

Having been informed of the clerical error, the Panel instructed the secretariat to send reasons review notifications to the claimants.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

After a review of the statistical data, the Panel decided that a decision regarding any global adjustment should be deferred until after the individual review of the claims, to determine whether such review was sufficient to adjust or eliminate overstated claims.

We note that 23 countries have signed on to the African Peer Review Mechanism, and the Peer Review Panel has completed country reviews for Ghana and Rwanda and presented its report to the African Peer Review Forum in Abuja for discussion.

In the third F4 report, the Panel noted that the primary sources of the law to be applied by the Panel in the review of claims for compensation are listed in article 31 of the Rules.

These personal losses were not transferred to the Panel for review but remained in category D for processing as category D claims.

The review would be initiated with an interactive expert panel, comprising representatives of Member States, United Nations entities and non governmental organizations.

In its review of the claim, the Panel has taken into consideration Iraq's comments together with the evidence adduced by the claimant.

Upon review of all documents submitted by the competing claimants, the Panel was unable to find any evidence that supported this contention.

With regard to NEPAD's African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), the panel of eminent persons making up this programme has already been identified.

Recalling the experience of the Palestinian Panel during its review of the category C Palestinian late claims , and having been provided with information by the Palestinian Panel concerning specific irregularities in certain category D claims, the Panel closely examined the evidence submitted by claimants in this instalment for irregularities.

Iraq provided comments on all of these claims and the Panel has taken these comments into account in its review of the claims.

The Panel also confirmed that the results of the projects had been valuable to it in the review of the substantive environmental claims.

A detailed nomination by nomination review of the recommendations by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel and the Committee can be found on pages 203 241 of the 2005 progress report by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel.

Summary of recommended awards in the fifth F4 instalment COMPLETION OF THE REVIEW OF F4 CLAIMS This report completes the work of the Panel.

Before the claims in this instalment were submitted to the Panel, the secretariat undertook a complete review of these claims in accordance with the Rules.

C. Review of the status of destruction technologies identified by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel in its 2002 report as emerging (decision XVI 15)

In the period under review, the Bureau held panel discussions on the themes of Women and Leadership' and Positive Images of Women in the Media'.

The D2 Panel of Commissioners is one of two Panels appointed to review individual claims for damages above 100,000 United States dollars (USD) (category D claims).

Two panel discussions were arranged, Freedom from Fear and Want the Human Rights Year in Review , and Human Rights Education in the School System Practical Experiences .

) (b) Review of the status of destruction technologies identified by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel in its 2002 report as emerging (decision XVI 15) (I wouild change the title of this agenda item to Review of destruction technologies )

As the D1 Panel is not mandated to review claims of corporate entities, these losses were severed from the category D claims, and transferred to category E4 .

Item 3 (b) Review of the status of destruction technologies identified by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel in its 2002 report as emerging (decision XVI 15)

Royal Society of Canada (1996). A review of the INSERM Report on the health effects of exposure to asbestos Report of the Expert Panel on Asbestos Risk.

Accordingly, all but one of these claims were transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for review as stand alone claims in accordance with decision 123.

Review of the E2 claim Applying the procedures described in paragraph 67, the Panel reviewed the E2 claim in this instalment according to the loss types identified below.

The review panel will consist of a high level representative from the Government, an international expert, and representatives from the domestic private sector and the international private sector.

Upon review of the claims in this instalment for which audited financial statements were provided, the Panel became concerned about the authenticity of the allegedly contemporaneous audited accounts.

The Panel reviewed the overlapping claims together to determine which of the losses claimed by the category C claimant should be consolidated with the E4 claim for review.