The results are shown in table 1.

The costing variances are shown in table 12.

A list of such techniques is shown in table 1.

Explanatory notes are shown following table 3.1.1. .

Non post resources total 29,476,500, as shown in the table below

The details of the costs are shown in table 4 below.

Total includes US 100,000 for UNICEF not shown in the table.

Expenditure in 2004 totalled US 1,062.6 million as shown in Table 1.

Epidemiological surveillance data from the PNLS are shown in the attached table.

A comparison with the biennium 2000 2001 is shown in table 3.

The aggregate summary of the RFA accounts is shown in table 12.

Finnish involvement in ongoing international space programmes and projects is shown in table 2.

The details of these amounts are shown in the table contained in annex V.

As shown in table 2 below, the Panel recommends a total of USD 25,872,466.70.

7.7 The percentage distribution of resources under this section is as shown in table 7.1

The overall distribution of posts by grade is shown in table 2 of the report.

The percentage distribution of the resources under this section is shown in table 28F.3.

The overall framework of these accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 23.1.

The number of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 13.1.

Access to initialization entries can also be handled with the macros shown in Table 39 1.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 11.1.

The percentage distribution of regular budget resources under this section is as shown in table 30.2.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 27.1.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 14.1.

23.14 The estimated percentage distribution of resources under this section is as shown in table 23.3.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 29.1.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 9.1 below.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 28G.1.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 28F.2.

The overall framework of these expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 21.1 below.

The overall framework of the expected accomplishments and indicators of achievement is shown in table 28D.1.

29.12 The estimated percentage distribution of resources under this section would be as shown in table 29.2.

The number of female colonel and brigadier general are at an ascent, as shown in the following table.

21.16 The estimated percentage distribution of resources under this section would be as shown in table 21.3 below.

Recently released official Palestinian data, shown in table 1, indicate some recovery in 2003 with 4.5 per cent GDP growth.

The proposed combined standards are shown on Table 1 within the Annex to this document.

11.14 The estimated percentage distribution of the resources of the programme in the biennium 2006 2007 is shown in table 11.3.

Resource requirements by budget section are shown in table 48 of the report of the Secretary General (A 60 537).

Percentage shares and contributions of the top 15 OECD DAC donors for selected UNDP activities are shown in table 1.

27.12 The estimated percentage distribution of the resources of the programme in the biennium 2006 2007 is as shown in table 27.4.

Land based tourism has also increased greatly from 106 tourists in 1996 1997 to 878 in 2004 2005, as shown in table 4.

The proposed financial plan sets planned regular resources expenditures (annex III, table 3) at a level that ensures continuous strict compliance with this requirement, as shown in annex III, table 5.

The estimated yearly phasing of expenditures on approved, new and future programme recommendations is also shown in annex III, table 3.

Ultimately, it would be necessary to produce a list of mutually acceptable verification methods, for example as shown in table 4.

For the second category (operations based features) an analogous set of verification techniques can be identified. These are shown in table 2.