Before the Court could decide on the application, the respondent nominated an arbitrator.

2.3 The author lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 29 January 1997.

The State party points out that the author should have lodged an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

The Court rejected the application.

One of the formal requirements for filing an application for amparo before the Constitutional Court is to have exhausted judicial remedies, and the author had referred to the violation of her right to use means of proof in the application for reconsideration before the High Court.

The lower court rejected the application.

If an application before a single Federal Court judge had been unsuccessful, the author would have had the right to seek leave to appeal to the full Federal Court.

However, there is currently an application before the High Court by a non Namibian couple who wish to adopt a Namibian baby.

Mr Muller's application was dismissed by the High Court.

In his submission on 23 April 2001, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 28 June 1999 to allege that it was not necessary to lodge an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

The Court considered the application to be admissible but groundless.

The High Court dismissed the application on 25 September 1996.

(2) The court shall grant or refuse an application for recognition of a foreign main proceeding within ____ days after the application has been filed with the court.

The Supreme Court, as the highest court, shall ensure uniform application of laws and equality of citizens.

2.6 On 26 October 1998, the first author requested before the plenary session of the Constitutional Court the annulment of the proceedings in the amparo application.

Moreover, at the hearing before the Court of Appeal, the lawyer remarked that he could not support his client apos s application for leave to appeal.

Application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

2.8 On 26 May 1997 the Constitutional Court rejected the application.

(a) An application or court order for provisional measures (including an application for review and modification or termination) and

He would stand before court,

In particular, could women bring directly before the Constitutional Court allegations that the application of the laws implementing the Convention, rather than the laws themselves, was unconstitutional?

Before the application deadline, there are fourteen candidates.

Supreme Court Barrister in 1989 several cases before the Supreme Court.

Application for leave to appeal denied by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Application for leave to appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Lastly, her application to the Constitutional Court for amparo was also rejected.

His application was heard by a different composition of the Supreme Court.

The law also provides that a court on application for a legal remedy (appeal) shall hear the parties and receive the prosecutor's proposal before declaring a claim inadmissible.

On 23 April 2001, the author cited the Constitutional Court ruling of 28 June 1999, made two years after the original claim, to allege that it was not necessary to lodge an amparo application before the Constitutional Court.

2.3 On 26 May 1997 Madrid Social Court No. 3 rejected his application.

On 12 December 1991, the Supreme Court dismissed the author apos s application.

The author filed an application for review of that decision, an application that was rejected by the court on 7 July 1998.

Proceedings before the International Court of Justice

3.3 The author did not make any application to the Constitutional Court for amparo.

(d) the application has been submitted to the court referred to in article 4.

(d) The application has been submitted to the court referred to in article 4.

2.4 On 10 July 1996, the first author filed an application for amparo on his own behalf, and not representing the second author, before the second division of the Constitutional Court.

As this had not been the case yet, the Higher Regional Court considered that the application to appoint an arbitrator had been filed before the claimant was entitled to do so.

The application for adjournment was dismissed, as well as the author apos s application to have the custody and property matter heard in a different court on the grounds that the Family Court had no jurisdiction.

When his complaint was rejected at the lower court and appeal levels, the author filed an application for amparo with the Constitutional Court.

In this case the matter is settled only through court, the child's mother submitting an application to court requesting the establishment of paternity.

The case is currently before Alaska's Veteran's Court.

The petition is still pending before the Court.

1982 Authorization to plead before the Supreme Court

(b) Recourse proceedings are possible before a court.