The author has been battered by this same man, her former common law husband.

This link references the author.

Videotape submission by the author

Additional comments by the author

Who's the author of this story?

The author is represented by counsel.

Facts as submitted by the author

The author appealed against this decision, which was confirmed by the Minister of Interior on 1 January 2003.

The communication also appears to raise issues under article 7 of the Covenant, with regard to the author and her son, although this provision was not directly invoked by the author.

Who is the author of this book?

Who is the author of this story?

The facts as presented by the author

The author is not represented by counsel.

The author is not represented by counsel.

The author is not represented by counsel.

The author claims that this decision was sustained by the appellate bodies without any further examination or reasoned decision.

Here, the author is represented by legal counsel, and this further justifies the ordinary application of exhaustion as a prerequisite.

According to the author, this request was delivered to the Court by 8.00 a.m. on the day of the hearing.

The author further states that L. F. has not been detained at any time in this connection and that no action has been taken by the Hungarian authorities to protect the author from him.

The communication was submitted by the author personally.

The author applied for judicial review of this decision.

This link type tells search engines which document is considered by the author to be the starting point of the collection.

Comments by the author on the State party's submissions

The author is represented by counsel, Mr. Achilleas Demetriades.

The author is represented by counsel, Miquel Nadal Borràs.

This confirms that the author was indeed under house arrest.

In the present case, the author has not done this.

2.1 The author and his wife concluded an agreement dissolving their marriage, and this was approved by the court in February 1990.

The author is represented by Mr. José Luis Mazón Costa.

Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Admissibility ratione materiae

Procedural issues Substantiation of claim by author Admissibility ratione materiae

The author is represented by counsel (Mrs. Encarnación Caballero Oliver).

According to the author, this limitation constitutes a violation of the right to review of the judgement and conviction by a higher tribunal.

This was by no means so in the present case, in which the author confines herself to general condemnation without any objective argument.

The author served this sentence in different correctional facilities in Graz.

2.2 The author challenged this decision in the Preobrazhenski Municipal Court.

The author is represented by counsel, Mr. José Luis Mazón Costa.

The author is represented by counsel, Mr. José Javier Uriel Batuecas.

Procedural issues Substantiation of claims by author Exhaustion of domestic remedies

It seems to us that the author must at least substantiate in some measure his complaint as the author has undoubtedly done in this case.

This is unheard of, both for us the publisher, and the author.

The author has not rebutted this assertion, which she herself passed on.

Several requests by the author for clarification of these terms were unsuccessful.

To the author, this further confirms that the judge was partial and prejudiced.

The author describes this remedy as an extraordinary remedy and one which is only available in cases of a violation of the law by lower courts.