The plaintiff asserted a claim against both defendants.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

(1) Arrest is permissible of any ship in respect of which a maritime claim is asserted if

(1) Arrest is permissible of any ship in respect of which a maritime claim is asserted if .

A claim is materially deficient if the claimant has not asserted any identifiable loss type or indicated the amount of loss being claimed.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

The Panel finds that two of the claims do not meet the criteria for compensability of the asserted losses, while another is a duplicate claim.

Claim No. 5000304 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000304 comprises five claim units, with an asserted value of USD 4,330,635,352, for depletion of natural resources as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

New or greater losses asserted and new evidence included in the individual claim supporting an adjustment to the original E4 award

Claim No. 5000286 Agricultural resources Claim No. 5000286 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 441,895,991, for alleged losses to agricultural crops caused by air pollution and acid rain resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Claim No. 5000460 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000460 comprises three claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 967,831,391, for loss of ecological and human services resulting from damage to or depletion of terrestrial, marine and groundwater resources.

Recommended award for Claim No. 5000309 Claim No. 4002545 Agricultural resources (Shadco) Claim No. 4002545 comprises two claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 2,676,101, for losses of agricultural crops by the Ash Sharqiah Development Co. ( Shadco ) as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012049 a claimant asserted losses in the amount of USD 265,034 in connection with a spare parts business.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011224 the claimant asserted, in addition to her own losses, a salary loss on behalf of her husband.

Claim No. 5000309 Agricultural resources Claim No. 5000309 comprises two claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 481,442, for losses of livestock and crop resources in the Al Hassa region of Saudi Arabia as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The total amount asserted for interest is USD 14,169,831.69.

Some claimants who previously asserted that they did not have certain types of supporting documents produced them after engaging the services of a claim preparer.

The claimant asserted his claim on the category D claim form as follows USD 112,600,000 for loss of tangible business property, USD 54,725,600 for loss of business income and USD 3,675,000 for payment of relief to others.

Under the Rules, claimants are required to provide an affirmation as to the accuracy of the information contained in the claim and the losses being asserted.

The total amount asserted for claims preparation costs is USD 76,339.12.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000304 Claim No. 5000464 Public health Claim No. 5000464 comprises three claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 886,481,830, for losses due to the presence of refugees who entered Jordan after departing from Iraq or Kuwait between 2 August 1990 and 2 March 1991 as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

Claim No. 5000462 is for damage to cultural heritage resources claim No. 5000467 is for damage to livestock resources and claim No. 5000303 is for public health damage.

Keyes is rejecting your claim.

The Court of Appeal consequently asserted its jurisdiction.

In particular, the Foreign Secretary asserted the following

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

For this reason, we believe it is high time the world order asserted itself in modern terms.

Losses asserted in the nine additional deceased detainee claims

Iraq also asserted that the data provided was incomplete.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012210 the claimant, who was 22 years old at the time of the invasion, asserted tangible property and profit losses totalling USD 5.6 million for his auto repair shop in Kuwait.

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

No overlap due to the nature of the loss asserted

The vendors claim it is Côte d'Ivoire.