The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

Claim No. 5000304 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000304 comprises five claim units, with an asserted value of USD 4,330,635,352, for depletion of natural resources as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

New or greater losses asserted and new evidence included in the individual claim supporting an adjustment to the original E4 award

Claim No. 5000286 Agricultural resources Claim No. 5000286 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 441,895,991, for alleged losses to agricultural crops caused by air pollution and acid rain resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Claim No. 5000460 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000460 comprises three claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 967,831,391, for loss of ecological and human services resulting from damage to or depletion of terrestrial, marine and groundwater resources.

Recommended award for Claim No. 5000309 Claim No. 4002545 Agricultural resources (Shadco) Claim No. 4002545 comprises two claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 2,676,101, for losses of agricultural crops by the Ash Sharqiah Development Co. ( Shadco ) as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012049 a claimant asserted losses in the amount of USD 265,034 in connection with a spare parts business.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011224 the claimant asserted, in addition to her own losses, a salary loss on behalf of her husband.

Claim No. 5000309 Agricultural resources Claim No. 5000309 comprises two claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 481,442, for losses of livestock and crop resources in the Al Hassa region of Saudi Arabia as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Some claimants who previously asserted that they did not have certain types of supporting documents produced them after engaging the services of a claim preparer.

The Panel finds that two of the claims do not meet the criteria for compensability of the asserted losses, while another is a duplicate claim.

The claimant asserted his claim on the category D claim form as follows USD 112,600,000 for loss of tangible business property, USD 54,725,600 for loss of business income and USD 3,675,000 for payment of relief to others.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000304 Claim No. 5000464 Public health Claim No. 5000464 comprises three claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 886,481,830, for losses due to the presence of refugees who entered Jordan after departing from Iraq or Kuwait between 2 August 1990 and 2 March 1991 as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Multiple nationality and claim against a third State

Multiple nationality and claim against a State of nationality

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

Draft article 6 Multiple nationality and claim against a third State

Draft article 7 Multiple nationality and claim against a State of nationality

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3012210 the claimant, who was 22 years old at the time of the invasion, asserted tangible property and profit losses totalling USD 5.6 million for his auto repair shop in Kuwait.

Presumably any such claim would be against the international community as a whole, rather than against a particular State.

Of the 19 claims, 18 were deferred for determinations in respect of stand alone, overlapping and competing business claim issues and for investigation of potential irregularities in the documentation provided by claimants in support of their asserted business losses.

(a) The person asserting a claim against the carrier has the option of either

The State party observes that the claim for protection against possible future separation of the family unit was expressly referred to in the claim for a protection visa.

No overlap due to the nature of the loss asserted

They dispute the claim that they may institute civil proceedings for damages against the State party.

The Palestinian and Jordanian claimants each asserted a one sixth interest in the businesses as at 2 August 1990 while the Kuwaiti claimant asserted that she was their sole owner.

For example, in UNCC claim No. 3011398 the claimant advanced a large currency loss for invalid Kuwaiti dinars and worthless Iraqi dinars totalling USD 311,418 relating to insurance premiums that he asserted he was required, as an insurance broker, to collect during Iraq's occupation of Kuwait.

2. A State is no longer entitled to exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a corporation that acquires the nationality of the State against which the claim is brought after the presentation of the claim.

Egypt later asserted that this attack violated the Base Agreement and denounced the treaty.

2.3 Royal filed a claim in the Utrecht Regional Court against the author and VVAA for compensation for the remaining damages.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

In several instances, the auditing firms asserted that the financial statements were authentic and contemporaneous.

In those cases where they had, the information provided during the interviews was cross checked against the contents of the claim files.

4. A State is no longer entitled to exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person who acquires the nationality of the State against which the claim is brought after the date of the official presentation of the claim.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

During the first interview with the Swedish Immigration Board he asserted that he was not married.

The Panel has made recommendations with respect to the remaining personal losses asserted in these claims.

But there should not be a gap between what society accepted and what its laws asserted.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

His claim was also separately assessed against the Guidelines for stay in Australian on humanitarian grounds, which include article 3 of the Convention.