32.4 A Party to the Convention asserting a claim pursuant to this Article shall submit its claim in writing to any Annex _ Party against whom it makes such claim within six years following the year for which the claim is made.

A Party to the Convention asserting a claim pursuant to this Article shall submit its claim in writing to any Annex _ Party against whom it makes such claim within six years following the year for which the claim is made.

9. Claim by Third Parties against UNEP

Multiple nationality and claim against a third State

The plaintiff asserted a claim against both defendants.

Multiple nationality and claim against a State of nationality

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

A lawyer representing a woman. A claim against the estate.

Draft article 6 Multiple nationality and claim against a third State

3.2 The authors claim that the trial against them was unfair.

We do not claim to have made a perfect document.

Draft article 7 Multiple nationality and claim against a State of nationality

Consequently, a correction should be made in respect of this claim.

Presumably any such claim would be against the international community as a whole, rather than against a particular State.

Please note that no claim has been lodged against UNAVEM III by ... Airlines.

(a) The person asserting a claim against the carrier has the option of either

Accordingly, the Procedural Order issued for that Claim requested that the Government of Kuwait comment on certain statements made within the Claim and file any documents relevant to the Claim with the Commission.

1. In a claim by the assignee against the debtor for payment of the assigned receivable, the debtor may raise against the assignee all defences and rights of set off arising from the original contract, or any other contract that was part of the same transaction, of which the debtor could avail itself as if the assignment had not been made and such claim were made by the assignor.

(a) In a claim by the assignee against the account debtor for payment of the assigned receivable, the account debtor may raise against the assignee all defences and rights of set off arising from the original contract, or any other contract that was part of the same transaction, of which the account debtor could avail itself as if the assignment had not been made and such claim were made by the assignor

The State party observes that the claim for protection against possible future separation of the family unit was expressly referred to in the claim for a protection visa.

The respondent set off against this claim a damage claim for lost profit owing to the termination of the business relation with the claimant and refused to pay.

They dispute the claim that they may institute civil proceedings for damages against the State party.

For this purpose, the Austrian seller assigned to the plaintiff its purported damages claim against the defendant.

The authors claim that the judge made comments that were unnecessary and highly prejudicial to them.

Against this claim, the defendant set off a claim for damages caused by an alleged breach of the distribution agreement owing to plaintiff apos s refusal to deliver further engines.

It also recognizes beneficiaries as active subjects and claim holders and establishes duties or obligations for those against whom a claim can be brought to ensure that needs are met.

Any Annex I _ Party liable on a claim made pursuant to this Article shall have a claim for contribution against another Annex I _ Party for the portion of the liability that is attributable to the performance or attempted performance by such other Annex I _ Party of its commitments referred to in paragraph 152.2.

the applicant deliberately falsifying the subject matter of the insurance, whereupon an insurance claim is fraudulently made

The statement of claim does not explain any of the circumstances under which the payments were made.

Where a claim is made against another State, it is suggested that the victim apos s Government, through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and or the human rights institutions of the Member State represent the victim.

However, the author has not substantiated his claim that the court acted arbitrarily or that it discriminated against him.

The defendant set off these costs against the plaintiff apos s claim (articles 45(1)(b) and 74 CISG).

He made me go against my will.

32.5 Any Annex I Party liable on a claim made pursuant to this Article shall have a claim for contribution against another Annex I Party for the portion of the liability that is attributable to the performance or attempted performance by such other Annex I Party of its commitments referred to in paragraph 1. (Venezuela et al)

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

Asked whether he had been subjected to any kind of systematic abuse, he made no claim to such effect.

In the unlikely event of the claim not being settled, full provision has been made within accounts payable other .

2. A State is no longer entitled to exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a corporation that acquires the nationality of the State against which the claim is brought after the presentation of the claim.

Other false allegations had been made against him.

Attacks must only be made against military objectives.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

2.3 Royal filed a claim in the Utrecht Regional Court against the author and VVAA for compensation for the remaining damages.

9.3 With respect to the claim of quot undue delay quot in the judicial proceedings against the authors, two issues arise.