The insolvency law should specify that, if a security right is entitled to priority under law other than the insolvency law, that priority continues unimpaired in insolvency proceedings except if, pursuant to the insolvency law, another claim is given priority.

Note to the Working Group See recommendation I in the recommendations of this Guide on Insolvency The insolvency law should specify that, if a security right is entitled to priority under law other than the insolvency law, that priority continues unimpaired in insolvency proceedings except if, pursuant to the insolvency law, another claim is given priority.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000468 Claim No. 5000183 Public health Claim No. 5000183 comprises four claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 1,476,336,427, for losses resulting from damage or risk of damage to public health.

The elements of Claim No. 5000309 were originally part of claim 5000208 in the F2 claims category.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Water of Saudi Arabia originally submitted this claim unit as claim 5000207.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000463 Claim No. 5000219 Public health Claim No. 5000219 comprises three claim units, with an asserted value of USD 19,861,782,707, for damage or risk of damage to public health resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The law should have a complete set of priority rules covering all possible priority conflicts.

(188) The insolvency law should specify that secured claims should be satisfied from the encumbered asset in liquidation or pursuant to a reorganization plan, subject to claims that are superior in priority to the secured claim, if any.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

Recommended award for Claim No. 5000309 Claim No. 4002545 Agricultural resources (Shadco) Claim No. 4002545 comprises two claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 2,676,101, for losses of agricultural crops by the Ash Sharqiah Development Co. ( Shadco ) as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

Claim No. 5000304 Loss of natural resources Claim No. 5000304 comprises five claim units, with an asserted value of USD 4,330,635,352, for depletion of natural resources as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The Claim

The claim

Overlapping claim

Recommended awards for the thirtieth instalment E2 claim by UNCC claim number, claimant name and category of loss 43

This claim was initially part of Syria's fourth F4 instalment claim No. 5000457 for remediation of damage to agricultural and forestry resources.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

Iraq asserts that this claim unit should be rejected as a claim filed after the expiry of the applicable deadline.

(a) Identification of priority information needs.

Rule of law priority standards challenges

Freedom of movement priority standards challenges

Priority countries