This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

Environmental consideration was served with every plate, but it was served with a heaping mound of consideration for human interests at the same time.

The claim was dismissed.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

The author's appeal was delayed until after he had served his prison term.

Accordingly, this claim was not transferred to the merged E4 Panel of Commissioners for substantive review rather, the claim fails.

Noting also that claim number 4002126 was thus filed as a consolidated claim in the name of Syndicate 1131 at Lloyd's,

The secretariat's review of the documents provided in support of this claim indicated that the claimant's D6 claim was complementary to, and not a duplicate of, his C6 claim, and therefore the deduction initially performed by the secretariat was incorrect.

In 2000, the Smith's Landing (Salt River) claim was settled.

This separate claim against Egypt was thus inadmissible ratione personae.

Claim No. 4002545 was originally in the E2 claims category.

This claim was initially part of Syria's fourth F4 instalment claim No. 5000457 for remediation of damage to agricultural and forestry resources.

In 2004, the Fort McKay claim was settled, involving 20,000 acres.

a This claim was previously included in the twenty ninth instalment.

The Panel also reviewed each individual claim and its related E4 claim to ensure that there was no likelihood of duplication of awards.

The author's claim was thereafter dismissed and following the rejection of his claim, the author filed four successive motions in the Supreme Court.

In three of them (Costa Rica, Ireland and Mozambique), the period to be served was mandatory.

None of us could justly claim that our failure as the United Nations to take specific decisions on these matters served to enhance global security in the face of the threat of weapons of mass destruction.

Subsequently, in response to claim development, the individual claimant stated that he had no ownership interest in the company, and that his claim relating to the company was submitted in error by his claim preparer.

In the appeal to the Supreme Court, his claim was similarly dismissed.

This claim unit was deferred from the second instalment of F4 claims.

He was convicted of rape, kidnapping and robbery, and served seven years of a 47 year sentence.

but that she served, apart from God, barred her, for she was of a people of unbelievers.'

but that she served, apart from God, barred her, for she was of a people of unbelievers.'

Natural disasters were not well served by telemedicine because the infrastructure for it was not in place.

Best served chilled.

A general claim that the agreement was only applied in relation to some employees was not sufficient.

While UNIFIL was unable to verify this claim, local residents reported hearing explosions.

Teams of women cooked for male farmworkers, and fresh baked pie was served at breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The children of Israel did that which was evil in the sight of Yahweh, and served the Baals

The children of Israel did that which was evil in the sight of Yahweh, and served the Baals

The United States was fully aware that many of the Organization's substantive interests were best served by pluralism.

The original claim also included a claim for decreased shrimp landings from 1994 2000 that was to be addressed by a raise and release programme for shrimps.

You've served so well.

Are you being served?

Claim No. 5000394 was originally considered by the Panel in the first F4 instalment.

The State party observes that the claim for protection against possible future separation of the family unit was expressly referred to in the claim for a protection visa.

And he said unto him, Thou knowest how I have served thee, and how thy cattle was with me.

And he said unto him, Thou knowest how I have served thee, and how thy cattle was with me.

He served his sentence, was paroled and returned to work to find that he had been dismissed and replaced.

He was a brilliant diplomat, dedicated and talented, who served his country and its causes with the utmost dedication.