In the light of this finding, it is unnecessary to consider the author's additional claim under article 7.

It has some of the characteristics of a class conflict, with age old rulers who claim to own their servants, whom they consider to be inferior.

7.3 In the light of this finding in respect of article 14, paragraph 1, it is not necessary to consider the claim arising under article 14, paragraph 2.

5.5 The Committee considers there to be no impediment to the admissibility of the author's remaining claim under article 14 (2), and proceeds to consider it on the merits.

They consider the angels, God's servants, to be female. Did they witness their creation? Their claim will be put on record and they will be questioned about it.

They consider the angels, God's servants, to be female. Did they witness their creation? Their claim will be put on record and they will be questioned about it.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

Consider the Islamic State s recent declaration of a caliphate in parts of Iraq and Syria. Most Sunnis are outraged by the brutal behavior of the Islamic State s self appointed caliph, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, and consider his claim that he will eventually conquer Rome ridiculous.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

7.4 As regards the remaining claim of a violation of article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, the Committee is of the view that it is admissible and proceeds to consider it on the merits.

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

Since the State party had not been requested to make submissions on the admissibility of these aspects of the author's claim and the domestic remedies which the author exhausted only dealt with his conviction for fishing out of season, these aspects of the author's claim were not encompassed in the Committee's admissibility decision and the Committee will therefore not consider these issues.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

The claim was dismissed.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

The elements of Claim No. 5000309 were originally part of claim 5000208 in the F2 claims category.

Overlapping claim

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

6.4 The Committee considers that the author's claim may give rise to issues under article 12, paragraph 2, of the Covenant and therefore proceeds to consider them on the merits, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol.

In some instances, the Panel examined one E4 claim in relation to more than one individual claim.

In other instances, the Panel examined an individual claim in relation to more than one E4 claim.

Rather, the current claim relates to a separate and distinct claim relating to family unity and stability.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Water of Saudi Arabia originally submitted this claim unit as claim 5000207.

Recommended award for claim No. 5000301 Claim No. 5000288 Other resources Claim No. 5000288 comprises six claim units, with a total asserted value of USD 7,916,024,475, for losses resulting from Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.

The Secretariat should consider whether the text of draft article 75 bis should modified by deleting the word claim , and by adding after the word parties the following phrase to the dispute under the contract of carriage after the dispute has arisen .

The Governing Council instructs the secretariat to notify the Government of the State of Kuwait to consider appropriate action to recover the total amount of USD 198,060.04 from the category D claimant (claim number KW 3010140) and return it to the Compensation Fund,