Masaru claims that he is innocent.

He claims that that constitutes discrimination based on age.

He claims that he was denied the right to appeal from this decision.

He claims that he verbally requested permission to write letters, through the interpreter.

He claims that they were taken regularly to be tortured.

He claims that he was released after his mother had promised that he would join the Awami League.

The author claims that she was able to identify him only because he has part of an ear missing he claims that the police had instructed her accordingly.

There was no evidence to support claims that he was beaten.

There was no evidence to support claims that he was tortured.

Tom claims he doesn't remember.

3.3 The author further claims a violation of article 9, because he was subjected to arbitrary arrest and detention, since he claims that he was not involved in the rape.

He studies the brain using MRI, and he claims that this is the most beautiful brain that he has ever scanned.

All that he claims will revert to Us, and he will come before Us all alone.

All that he claims will revert to Us, and he will come before Us all alone.

3.1 The complainant claims that he will be tortured again if he is returned to Bangladesh.

At least that's what he claims.

He claims to be innocent and argues that he has never had sexual relations with any woman.

The complainant claims he was severely tortured.

This man claims he was assaulted here.

Fodderwing claims he can talk to vultures.

He also claims that the first opportunity he had to engage a private lawyer was at the inquest.

2.2 The author claims that he was set up and framed by the police.

The Panel determines that he is eligible to participate in the late claims programme.

Although the author claims that he never lost Czech citizenship, he formally became Czech citizen again in May 1993.

He was hospitalized with leg injuries and claims that the psychological torture continued while he was in the hospital.

He has moreover argued that fishing with a licence constitutes a privilege, whereas he claims to fish as of right.

He claims that he was tricked into acknowledging the debt as a way of regularizing his position in the company.

3.2 As a consequence of this treatment, he claims that his employment status was affected negatively.

He also claims that the two detectives threw him down a half a flight of stairs.

The Greek claims he is not one of them.

He also claims that in having submitted his appeal against his conviction for contempt, he has exhausted all available domestic remedies.

He claims that his treatment by the CBC constitutes harassment that threatened the continuity of his public service position.

Iraq commented that the claimant did not provide records showing the quantity of goods that he claims were looted.

16. Outliers are those claims that do not resemble similarly situated claims.

In that context she claims that

He says that he was released after nine days of imprisonment and it is certified that he was hospitalized from 11 to 20 February 1991. 2.5 He claims that he was arrested, for an unspecified reason, on 14 April 1991 and held in prison until 1 July 1991. While he says that he was not tortured during this imprisonment, he claims that he was kept for a period of time in a cell flooded with sewage water.

He further claims that his legal aid lawyer advised him to plead guilty and that, when he refused, the lawyer failed to cross examine the witnesses.

He claims that he went to a movie at about 11.30, returning home at 3.10 to find his father dead and himself arrested.

In addition, he claims that prison officers were able to gain access to documents relating to his petitions.

3.2 The author claims that he was tortured by the police to force him to give a statement.

The Committee notes that the author does not dispute this but that he still wishes the Committee to consider his claims.

Look, nobody believes in a press agent, Temple, if he makes claims he can't produce.

He claims that the unsatisfactory situation at the Commission he portrayed in his communication was that occurring at the time his complaint was considered by the Commission.

He claims that the judge failed to direct the jury properly on the issue of provocation and that he withdrew the issue of self defence from it.

Nobody has identified him. Nobody claims to know who he is.