2.7 The author contends that he has exhausted domestic remedies.

He contends that the HREOC did not examine his complaint with the requisite procedural fairness.

As a result, the author contends, he is gradually becoming blind.

He contends that it has been satisfactorily established that the complainant was in fact subjected to torture after his return.

The State party further notes that there is no medical evidence to support his claim, although he contends that he has suffered permanent damage to his hearing.

The author contends that he did not meet with the lawyer assigned to him until the day before the trial.

He further contends that incarceration on death row for over five years would per se constitute cruel and degrading treatment.

The author contends therefore that the violation of which he claims to be a victim is indeed attributable to the State party.

The State party contends that there is no evidence to support that claim.

He contends that as readily accessible foreign media are not restricted in the publication of poll data, the ban serves no effective purpose.

He contends that the proper test is whether there is a restrictive effect on political opinion through its omission in the Ontario Code.

Mr. Kelly contends that he had had no contacts with Mr. Chuck before the receipt of the letter on 1 March but that he sent explanations to Mr. Chuck immediately thereafter.

He contends that there is no domestic law which would protect non citizens and non whites from racial harassment and unlawful dismissal in Denmark.

Iraq contends that the methodologies that have been used by the Claimants are not acceptable.

He contends that he has been a victim of racial discrimination by Australia, although he does not invoke the provisions of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

The author contends that his case should have been treated the same way.

The author contends that article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant has been violated.

Iraq contends that no compensation for lost wildlife should be awarded to Saudi Arabia.

He contends that otherwise states would in effect be able to use civil damages awards to pay themselves out of the most serious human rights violations.

He contends that starting in October 1990, students of the school began to display signs of racism towards him the school authorities allegedly did not intervene.

He contends that the only proper course for Hungary would be to restitute those assets which were obtained by the State through extralegal or illegal means.

He contends that RRT used an unreasonably high standard of proof and that it has not carefully considered whether there is a real chance' of the complainant being persecuted if he returns to Sri Lanka.

2.5 As to the course of the trial, the author contends that the trial judge failed to direct the jury properly on the issue of self defence, although he had indicated that he would do so.

He contends that it is irrelevant that the Supreme Court in his case did not address the fiduciary breach question even if it had, the outcome would have remained unaltered.

He contends that the fact that the case was not referred to another Regional Court proved that the Hague Court of Appeal had an interest in passing judgement on the author's case.

The petitioner contends that the following statements were made at the meeting from the podium b

She contends that the criteria established in article 3 of the Convention have been fulfilled.

It contends that the family withdrew its application to the RRT on 12 January 1996.

2.4 The author contends that charges against him were fabricated, and that accusations against him were very general.

He contends that the revocation of his appointment to the post of District Court judge breached his right under that article to access, on general terms of equality, to public service.

The author contends that such treatment is psychological mental torture similar to the death row phenomenon .

Furthermore, Iraq contends that some of these losses have already been claimed in claim No. 5000288.

Iraq contends that Iran has failed to meet the evidentiary standard required to establish this claim.

Iraq also contends that Saudi Arabia has arbitrarily set baseline environmental services at the maximum level.

In any case, he contends that pursuing his application under the Act would be unreasonably prolonged and would not be effective as the Commission seeks to rely on exemptions.

3.3 The author contends that the unilateral abrogation of the CHCAs violates article 27 of the Covenant.

4.1 The State party contends that the communication is inadmissible since domestic remedies have not been exhausted.

Iraq contends that Iran has failed to prove long term damage to mangroves, coral reefs or fisheries.

Iraq contends that any degradation was caused by other factors, such as overgrazing and unsustainable land use.

Iraq contends that Saudi Arabia has not provided evidence of past or current damage to subtidal resources.

Counsel contends that such a superficial investigation cannot be deemed to amount to an effective domestic remedy.

The Cuban Government is not a victim, as it contends.

The author thus contends to have exhausted all domestic remedies.

However, Iran contends that the bulk of the losses were due to effects of the invasion and occupation.

2.1 The complainant contends that, in 1990, aged 14, he and 14 other boys were recruited by the Tamil National Army, which was working with the Indian Army they subsequently escaped.