Thus our proposed wording for paragraph 8 would read

Where wording is put in square brackets, the former Special Rapporteur suggests that such wording be deleted.

As regards the wording in square brackets in subparagraph (a), it was suggested that such wording might not be necessary.

They participated in NGO caucuses to propose wording to governments and their reports went to the EWL and to our member organizations.

The wording of section 9 closely follows the wording of the definition of racial discrimination in article 1 of the Convention.

Wherever wording is suggested as additions to or changes of the revised basic principles and guidelines, such wording is presented in italics.

Several delegations supported the wording proposed in paragraph 1.

Here we would like to register our reservations on the wording contained in operative paragraph 25 of the draft resolution (A 60 L.23) on fisheries.

The Chairperson accepted that wording.

1.2 Wording of the paragraph

In this context, an alternative wording to paragraph 14 could be

This narrows the definition of permanent establishment and our proposal is that the wording all or parts of the projects should be used.

Then my wording must've been wrong.

In this respect, see the wording in Part IV, article 2, paragraph 1.

The Chairman That is the wording in paragraph 6, its substantive session .

The wording lands or territories in article 10 needed to be clarified.

Unfortunately, the wording used here is different.

The Chairperson suggested wording to that effect.

Her delegation therefore supported the proposed wording.

Could accept the wording as it stands.

Deletion might mean certain drafting adjustments in the wording at least in article 3.

However, the wording of the references in Article 1 to the Charter of the United Nations and other instruments should be brought into conformity with the wording in other human rights instruments.

Those consultations had resulted in the wording of the draft resolution on Guam.

There is some support in the comments received for the present wording in 1(b).

I admit, my wording is a bit direct.

The wording of the provision is somewhat ambiguous.

This exact wording is reflected in the United Nations Commentary, paragraph 11, second indention.

The draft resolution contained inconsistencies, and the changes in its wording were totally unacceptable.

The wording similar agreement might have to be specified.

Nevertheless, whatever the wording, the question cannot be avoided.

Attention must be paid to the effect of the actual wording of the Commentary if the wording is drastic, local courts might ignore the changes.

In view of those arguments, several delegations supported the wording of article 2, paragraph 2.

This is clearly in contravention of the wording of article 13 ter of the statute.

Working in NGO coalitions, wording on these issues was drafted and suggested to government delegates.

Some wording was adopted by the delegates and used in outcome documents or other documents.

He reaffirmed support for the wording of article 3 in the framework of a consensus.

At the fourth session, the Chairperson suggested the following wording

At the fourth session the Chairperson suggested the following wording

At the fourth session the Chairperson suggested the following wording

(c) Drastic wording and far reaching statements should be avoided

The wording of paragraph (b) had left the question unresolved.

The wording of the paragraph was incompatible with Islamic law.

The wording of paragraph 7 had been altered to read

On the other hand, concern was expressed regarding a lack of correspondence between the wording of the paragraph and the wording of Article 39 of the Charter.

Therefore, it is suggested that the relevant wording in UN Model article 26 be as follows