The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal.

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal.

The Court of Appeal of Quebec rejected the appeal against the conviction and the Supreme Court of Canada refused the application for leave to appeal against this decision.

Application for leave to appeal denied by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Application for leave to appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada.

On 12 November 2002, the Danish Board of Appeal rejected the author's application for leave to appeal against the High Court's judgement.

Application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

On 4 May 1990, the Supreme Court rejected the authors leave to appeal.

2.16 On 17 March 2004, the Board of Appeal rejected Mr. Warming's application for leave to appeal the Grindsted District Court's decision to the High Court of Western Denmark.

The author's appeal to the Danish Refugee Board and his application to the Board of Appeal for leave to appeal the High Court's decision of 1 December 2003, were still pending when the State party made its submission.

On 3 May 2000, the Supreme Court refused the author's application for leave to appeal.

The authors could take a civil action for damages against the State in a District Court at first instance, if necessary, on appeal in the Court of Appeal, and subject to leave to appeal in the Supreme Court.

A request for special leave to appeal to the High Court was denied on 5 November 2002.

2.3 On 15 February 1994, the Quebec Court of Appeal refused to alter the verdict and on 11 August 1994 the Canadian Supreme Court rejected the author's application for leave to appeal.

Pre appeal procedures were ongoing during the reporting period, with a substantial number of pre appeal decisions being issued by the Appeals Chamber and the pre appeal judge, including several decisions dismissing motions for leave to present additional evidence under rule 115.

The latter decision may also be appealed against before the Supreme Court of Canada subject to the latter's granting of leave to appeal.

On 17 March 2004, the State party informed the Committee that, by decision of 17 February 2004, the Board of Appeal dismissed the author's application for leave to appeal against the High Court's decision of 1 December 2003.

2.7 The application of the authors' corporation for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was dismissed on 12 December 2002.

On 28 February 2002, the complainant withdrew an application to the High Court for leave to appeal the Full Federal Court's decision.

When you return they will appeal to you in the Name of God to leave them alone. So leave them alone. They are filthy and their dwelling will be hell as a recompense for what they had gained.

When you return they will appeal to you in the Name of God to leave them alone. So leave them alone. They are filthy and their dwelling will be hell as a recompense for what they had gained.

2.5 On 3 October 2001, the author requested leave to appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court but it was denied on 21 February 2002.

Finally, the author attacks the Supreme Court's failure to grant leave to appeal, on the basis that the questions presented novel and fundamental issues.

Nor did he pursue an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court from the decision of the Full Federal Court concerning the second RRT decision.

The State party argues that the Supreme Court's decision of 4 May 1990, rejecting the authors' request for leave to appeal, is the final decision in the case.

Allow me here to make my personal appeal to the world summit not to leave Somalia out in the cold in this crucial period of its pacification and nation building.

Pharaoh said, Leave me to kill Moses, and let him appeal to his Lord. I fear he may change your religion, or spread disorder in the land.

Pharaoh said, Leave me to kill Moses, and let him appeal to his Lord. I fear he may change your religion, or spread disorder in the land.

Under Greek law, there are no grounds for a further appeal seeking leave that such a procedural flaw be remedied and thus the decision is effectively final.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

In respect of the second RRT decision, the Committee observes that the complainant withdrew his application to the High Court for special leave to appeal, again without offering any reasons for this course of action.

On 6 October 2000, upon appeal, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld this decision.

The Committee declared the complaint admissible, even though the complainant had not applied to the Federal Court for leave to appeal the Minister's decision not to grant a stay of his removal on humanitarian grounds.

Singapore Singapore Court of Appeal

Further rights of appeal may be made to the Pitcairn Court of Appeal, comprising three judges, and the Privy Council.

Later, and fairly recently, acquitted on appeal in fact, on the second appeal.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal and the Chief Justice confirmed the death sentence on 30 January 1997.

On appeal, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal quashed that decision and referred the matter back to the Frankfurt Regional Court.

An Appeal of the High Contracting Parties

President of the Appeal Penal Court Damascus

In August, a significant amendment to the Rules was made removing the requirement in Rules 54bis, 65 and 127 that leave be granted by a Bench of three Appeals Judges before a Bench of five Appeals Judges would decide an interlocutory appeal.

Based on 2005 Appeal should there be a need to launch another appeal during 2006 2007

He won the appeal.

the right to appeal.

That is my appeal.