C. Review of pay and benefits system

C. Hazard pay review of the level

C. Hazard pay review of the level

A. Review of the pay and benefits system

A. Review of the pay and benefits system

82. Pay commissions are appointed from time to time to review the wages of government employees.

(f) To review the level of hazard pay for locally recruited staff in the year 2002

The Commission, under its ongoing review of the pay and benefits system, continued to review the methodology for determining the level of the education grant.

I pay, I pay. I pay.

Pay! Pay!

The principle of capacity to pay must be taken fully into account in the review of the scale methodology in 2006.

In 1998, the Commission, at its forty seventh session, decided that the review of hazard pay should take place every three years.

(d) Approve the periodicity of the review and reference point for setting the hazard pay as set out in paragraph 143 above

The launching of the review of the pay and benefits system at the Commission's fifty seventh session had been a timely step.

2. Requests the Commission, in the context of the review of the pay and benefits system, to review the firm linkage between the base floor salary scale and the mobility and hardship allowance

She also recalled the principle established at the start of the pay and benefits review, which affirmed that the review should not result in diminished compensation but rather should enhance the compensation package.

3. Endorses the decision of the Commission to delink hazard pay from the base floor salary scale for staff in the Professional and higher categories, and to review the level of hazard pay every two years

With pay. With pay?

2. Takes note also of the decision of the Commission contained in paragraph 126 of its report to review the current mobility and hardship scheme in the context of the pay and benefits review

Just pay. You pay, Calloway.

At the time of the next review, the Commission decided that the amounts of hazard pay for both categories of staff would be examined.

7. Reiterates its request to the Commission to review, in the context of the review of the pay and benefits system, the existing linkage between the base floor salary scale and the mobility and hardship allowance

Based on its 2005 review of the level of hazard pay for both categories of staff, the Commission decided to increase the level of hazard pay granted to internationally recruited staff from 1,000 to 1,300, effective 1 January 2006.

1. Recognizes the work undertaken by the Commission in reviewing the current mobility and hardship scheme in the context of the pay and benefits review

Others pay him. Why should he pay you?

In 2001, the Commission decided, as part of its review of the pay and benefits system, to undertake a comprehensive review of allowances currently payable in the United Nations common system with a view to modernizing and simplifying them.

FICSA supported the expanded definition of hazard pay that had been proposed by the working group that met in Cyprus to review the mobility and hardship allowances.

Pay...

Pay attention here, you fellas. Come on, pay attention.

6. Requests the Commission, when conducting its review of the pay and benefits system, to bear in mind necessity for performance management systems to be fair and transparent

Surely, my lord They should pay, Caesar. They must pay.

5. Decides that no new strategy or pilot project in broad banding or pay for performance should be undertaken until the General Assembly has had an opportunity to review the results of the pilot study on broad banding and pay for performance being conducted by the Commission

I'll pay.

Pay attention!

Hazard pay

Pay to

I'll pay.

My pay?

Without pay.

Pay taxes,

I pay.

Pay him.

Pay him.

So, pay!

Pay attention.