Support was expressed for the principle.

Principle 8 Guarantees for persons implicated

PRINCIPLE 8. GUARANTEES FOR PERSONS IMPLICATED

Principle 9 Guarantees for witnesses and victims

PRINCIPLE 9. GUARANTEES FOR WITNESSES AND VICTIMS

Explicit provision should be made for that principle.

Principle 13 Measures for the preservation of archives

PRINCIPLE 13. MEASURES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ARCHIVES

Principle 14 Measures for facilitating access to archives

PRINCIPLE 14. MEASURES FOR FACILITATING ACCESS TO ARCHIVES

A prohibition in principle, with scope for exemptions.

Support was expressed for the principle in this provision.

Each principle has implications for rights in early childhood.

Principle ?

Principle 1 The Working Group discussed the following principle

Principle 5 The Working Groups discussed the following principle

Principle 32 Restrictions on the principle of due obedience

PRINCIPLE 32. RESTRICTIONS ON THE PRINCIPLE OF DUE OBEDIENCE

There could be no basis for exceptions to that principle.

In principle, that opens up distinct possibilities for international cooperation.

Principle 22 Measures for determining extraterritorial jurisdiction in domestic law

PRINCIPLE 22. MEASURES FOR DETERMINING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN DOMESTIC LAW

But how can you explain it s for a principle?

The principle of cooperation must complement the principle of competition.

Agreement was expressed for the provisions of the present draft principle, noting that the draft principle was consistent with the principles of the Rio Declaration as well treaty practice, which applied the polluter pays principle.

The State shall guarantee the principle of equal opportunities for citizens.

Paragraph 4 of the guidelines (principle of equal opportunities for promotion)

Principle 9 Guarantees for victims and witnesses testifying on their behalf

PRINCIPLE 9. GUARANTEES FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES TESTIFYING ON THEIR BEHALF

That's carrying the principle of art for art's sake too far.

Same principle.

It was noted that article 22 covered that principle. Principle 3

Principle 35 Restrictions on the principle of the irremovability of judges

PRINCIPLE 35. RESTRICTIONS ON THE PRINCIPLE OF THE IRREMOVABILITY OF JUDGES

Principle 32 Restrictions on the principle of the irremovability of judges

PRINCIPLE 32. RESTRICTIONS ON THE PRINCIPLE OF THE IRREMOVABILITY OF JUDGES

On the question of the conditions of service and application of the Noblemaire principle, support was expressed for the application of the Noblemaire principle.

Several delegations expressed their support for the principle of prompt and adequate compensation for victims, as reflected in draft principles 3 and 4, noting that principle 22 of the Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment14 and principle 13 of the Rio Declaration12 offered sufficient basis.

The notion of liability and compensation for victims was duly reflected in principle 22 of the Stockholm Declaration and principle 13 of the Rio Declaration.

According to this author, there should be four qualitative principles (a) the principle of origin, (b) the principle of source, (c) the principle of residence and (d) the principle of nationality.

There is no reason to classify the principle of abrogation, if this be the general principle, other than as a legal principle.

136. Measures for the disabled are based on the principle of solidarity.

The rules of evidence provided for in principle 18 (c) shall apply.

The rules of evidence provided for in principle 16 (c) shall apply.

It is couched in terms too vague even for a general principle.