He reiterated his claim that rejecting the Annan plan is not rejecting the solution itself in the island.

Each side has since ruled itself, while the Greek Cypriot side has continued to claim that it is the Government of Cyprus .

Accordingly, article 50 of the Covenant, by itself, cannot give rise to a free standing claim that is independent of a substantive violation of the Covenant.

And to say that such changes can persist after death is itself a factual claim, which, of course, may or may not be true.

That, surely, is to reinterpret the Ezulwini Consensus and the AU summit and to claim to know the minds of the African Union better than the Union itself.

It was no longer tenable for the United States of America to claim to be defending human rights while violating them itself in other parts of the world.

The claim preparers were often listed as the contact persons in the claim files and some claim files included attestations from the claim preparers opining on the merits of the claim.

The Committee considers, however, that aggravation of the complainant's state of health that might be caused by his deportation is in itself insufficient to substantiate this claim, which is accordingly considered inadmissible.

At the request of Saudi Arabia, the secretariat incorporated that claim in the current claim (Claim No. 5000463).

The sixth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The fifth claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The third claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

THE E2 CLAIM Background to the E2 claim The E2 claim in this instalment was initially filed in category D .

The first claim unit is for reduction in crop yields and the second claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

On the late delivery claim, the vendor argued that the buyer forfeited its right to complain because it was itself in breach of its payment obligation, specifically by failing to provide a timely letter of credit.

the unlawful conduct alleged by the applicant in order to establish its claim for compensation is to be attributed not to the Bundesanstalt, which was bound to comply with the Commission's instructions, but to the Commission itself .

The deferred part of claim No. 5000458 is reviewed as part of the second claim unit (terrestrial resources) of this claim.

Second claim unit Claim preparation costs Saudi Arabia seeks compensation in the amount of USD 5,874 for claim preparation costs.

The Claim

The claim

The Panel considers that this claim unit is for claim preparation costs.

The Panel considers that this is a claim for claim preparation costs.

Third claim unit Claim preparation costs Jordan seeks compensation in the amount of USD 1,700,000 for claim preparation costs for its fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, including its public health claim.

The claim comprises four claim units with an asserted value of USD 161,000,000.

4.2 The State party also challenges the claim that the execution of the deportation order would, in itself, constitute a violation of articles 2 or 16 of the Convention in view of the complainant and her daughter's fragile psychiatric condition.

In the Committee's view, therefore, this claim under article 50 is subsumed by the author's arguments on the substantive Covenant articles and is by itself inadmissible, for incompatibility with the provisions of the Covenant, under article 3 of the Covenant.

On 22 September 1998, the Hague Court of Appeal declared the author's claim inadmissible as, under Dutch law, the decision not to refer the case to another court could not be appealed separately from the Court's ruling on the case itself.

The deferred part of claim No. 5000379 has been included in claim No. 5000301.

The Palestinian individual claimant whose claim had been identified as potentially overlapping with the E4 claim has provided evidence to support the claim for loss of stock.

However, the design itself is not itself evaluated during the auction.

This claim was originally part of category F3 claim No. 5000194.

Sixth claim unit Claim preparation costs Iran seeks compensation in the amount of USD 4,500,000 for administrative, technical and legal expenses of the preparation of this claim.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Jordan that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000464 is claim No. 5000353.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000462 is claim No. 5000371.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000467 is claim No. 5000372.

The monitoring and assessment claim of Syria that was awarded funding in the first F4 instalment and is relevant to claim No. 5000303 is claim No. 5000419.

The claim was dismissed.

The claim preparation costs in claim No. 5000464 relate to all of Jordan's fourth and fifth F4 instalment claims, and not only its public health claim.

However, in the pursuit of a claim under domestic law, the individual must have access to effective remedies, which implies that the administrative authorities must act in conformity with the binding decisions of national courts, as admitted by the State party itself.

Now is not the time for the ICC to risk embroiling itself in similar controversy. The issues that would arise from dealing with allegations of aggression would give ammunition to the ICC s critics who claim that it is a highly politicized institution.

The elements of Claim No. 5000309 were originally part of claim 5000208 in the F2 claims category.

Overlapping claim

This claim is the deferred portion of claim No. 5000259 relating to remediation of coastal mudflats.

1. In a claim by the assignee against the debtor for payment of the assigned receivable, the debtor may raise against the assignee all defences and rights of set off arising from the original contract, or any other contract that was part of the same transaction, of which the debtor could avail itself as if the assignment had not been made and such claim were made by the assignor.

In some instances, the Panel examined one E4 claim in relation to more than one individual claim.