Singapore Singapore Court of Appeal

The Court dismissed the appeal.

2.7 On 28 June 1999, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

On appeal, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal quashed that decision and referred the matter back to the Frankfurt Regional Court.

The Court of Appeal of Quebec rejected the appeal against the conviction and the Supreme Court of Canada refused the application for leave to appeal against this decision.

President of the Appeal Penal Court Damascus

On 6 October 2000, upon appeal, the Borgarting Court of Appeal upheld this decision.

The authors could take a civil action for damages against the State in a District Court at first instance, if necessary, on appeal in the Court of Appeal, and subject to leave to appeal in the Supreme Court.

He appealed to the High Court and subsequently to the Court of Appeal.

The legal system comprises a Court of Appeal, a Supreme Court and a Magistrate's Court, with a final appeal procedure lying open to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

On 19 November 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application and on 24 December 1999, rejected his appeal from the Court of Appeal.

She appealed to the Paris Court of Appeal.

1990 1993 Judge, Gulating Lagmannsrett (appeal court), Bergen

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court dismissed the authors' appeal.

The Tunis court of appeal upheld that judgement.

The Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal.

The Federal Court of Appeal ruling may be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Appeared before Canada's Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal on administrative and security intelligence matters

Yet the Court of Cassation found that that ground had been discussed in the Appeal Court.

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal.

Canada Quebec Court of Appeal (Vallerand, Rothaman and Mailhot JJ.A.

Canada Alberta Court of Appeal (Kerans, Hetherington, and Irving JJ.

Canada Federal Court of Appeal (Heald, Mahoney and Stone JJ.

On 19 February 1999, the Federal Court dismissed the appeal.

The author appealed to the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

On 19 June 1989, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal.

The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal and the Chief Justice confirmed the death sentence on 30 January 1997.

The author's appeal to the Supreme Court was declared inadmissible on 26 September 1996, and an appeal to the Constitutional Court was dismissed on procedural grounds on 7 October 1998.

Application for leave to appeal was denied by the Supreme Court.

The results of the appeal to the Supreme Court are pending.

Canada Alberta Court of Appeal (Fraser, Conrad JJ. A., Picard J.)

Canada British Columbia Court of Appeal (Lambert, Wood and Hollinrake JJ.A.

On 30 June 1998, the Mirabadsky District Court dismissed her appeal.

On 21 April 1999, the Supreme Court rejected the author's appeal.

The Court of Appeal based its decision on the following grounds.

On 31 May 2002, the Supreme Court dismissed his further appeal.

On 12 September 2002, the Supreme Court declared the appeal inadmissible.

Further rights of appeal may be made to the Pitcairn Court of Appeal, comprising three judges, and the Privy Council.

2.9 On 2 October 2000, the Frankfurt Court of Appeal dismissed the authors' immediate appeal, in the absence of a legal error in the impugned decision of the Frankfurt Regional Court.

The National Prosecuting Authority said it will appeal to South Africa's Supreme Court, and the appeal could be heard this year.

2.3 On 15 February 1994, the Quebec Court of Appeal refused to alter the verdict and on 11 August 1994 the Canadian Supreme Court rejected the author's application for leave to appeal.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal of Monsanto in part.

Application for leave to appeal denied by the Supreme Court of Canada.

Application for leave to appeal dismissed by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court of Appeal considered the evidence in respect of each appellant.